Original Research

How Low Is Too Low? A Retrospective Analysis of Very Low LDL-C Levels in Veterans

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients aged 18 to 90 years receiving care at the Hershel “Woody” Williams Veterans Affairs Medical Center (HWW VAMC) in Huntington, West Virginia, between January 1, 2010, and September 1, 2020. Approval of the current study was obtained through the Marshall University Institutional Review Board, HWW VAMC Research and Development Committee, and Veterans Health Administration (VHA) DATA Access Request Tracker (DART)/VA Informatic and Computing Infrastructure (VINCI). Data were obtained via the VHA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) for the HWW VAMC using Microsoft Structured Query Language (SQL) server available in VINCI. Analysis of the data was conducted using STATA v. 15.

Patients were included if they had a diagnosis of hyperlipidemia/dyslipidemia, received treatment with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors or PCSK9 medications, and had an LDL-C level ≤ 40 mg/dL. The primary outcome was the rate of intracranial hemorrhage that could be caused by very low LDL-C levels. The secondary outcomes included actions taken by clinicians to address LDL-C level < 40 mg/dL, ADRs, duration of therapy, and medication adherence. Patients were excluded if they were aged < 18 or > 90 years, were pregnant during the study period, had hypothyroidism, received chronic anticoagulation medications, or had a triglyceride level > 300 mg/dL.

Results

The study included 3027 patients. Of those patients, 78 patients were female while 2949 were male, and the mean (SD) age was 68.3 (9.4) years. A subsample of 32 patients was analyzed to determine whether an ADR was noted or low LDL-C level was addressed in the chart. The subsample size was determined through chart review and included patients who had a documented intracranial hemorrhage. None of the 32 patients had an ADR documented, and 6 (19%) had the low LDL-C level addressed in the chart by monitoring levels, reducing statin doses, or discontinuing the medication. Of the total population analyzed, 8 patients (0.3%) had a documented intracranial hemorrhage within 1 year following the low LDL-C level.

We also analyzed the intensity of statin related to the low LDL-C level (Table 1).

The intensity of statin was broken into low, moderate, and high intensity according to ACC/AHA guidelines. There was a statistically significant difference between patients who had an LDL-C level < 40 mg/dL on a high-intensity statin compared with patients on a moderate- or low-intensity statin (P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference between moderate- and low-intensity statins (P > .05).

The most common ADRs were muscle, joint, and leg pain, rash, and cramps (Table 2).

Of the patients included in this study, the most common medications with ADRs documented were atorvastatin and pravastatin. Of the patients taking atorvastatin and pravastatin, 7.3% and 7.7%, respectively, had a documented ADR; however, this was not statistically significant. The medications with the least ADRs documented were lovastatin and simvastatin, with 3.1% and 1%, respectively (P > .05).

Adherence to the medications and duration of therapy was also analyzed and was found to be similar among the various medications. Lovastatin had the highest percent adherence with 91.2% while atorvastatin had the lowest with 85.5%. It can be noted that lovastatin had a lower documented percentage of ADRs while atorvastatin had a higher documented percentage of ADRs, which can be clinically meaningful when prescribing these medications; however, these similar adherence rates are not influencing the primary outcome of the rate of intracranial hemorrhage due to LDL-C level < 40 mg/dL. Mean duration of therapy lasted between 1 year and > 4 years with 1.1 years for alirocumab and 4.2 for simvastatin. The duration of therapy could be influenced by formulary restrictions during the study time. Nonetheless, patients, regardless of formulary restrictions, have taken these medications for a duration long enough to affect LDL-C levels.

Recommended Reading

New trial suggests CV benefit with EPA: RESPECT-EPA
Federal Practitioner
‘Lucid dying’: EEG backs near-death experience during CPR 
Federal Practitioner
EHR-based thromboembolism risk tool boosted prophylaxis
Federal Practitioner
Leukocytoclastic Vasculitis Masquerading as Chronic ITP
Federal Practitioner
First-line AFib ablation cuts risk of progression vs. drug therapy
Federal Practitioner
Statins boost glycemia slightly, but CVD benefits prevail
Federal Practitioner
Tirzepatide cuts BP during obesity treatment
Federal Practitioner
Outcomes After Prolonged ICU Stays in Postoperative Cardiac Surgery Patients
Federal Practitioner
Preoperative Insulin Intensification to Improve Day of Surgery Blood Glucose Control
Federal Practitioner
Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Driven Ambulatory Aspirin Deprescribing Protocol
Federal Practitioner