Case Reports
Burnt Out ? The Phenomenon of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in End-Stage Renal Disease
In patients with T2DM and ESRD, insulin is the antidiabetic medication of choice with a hemoglobin A1c target of 6 to 8%, using fructosamine...
Dr. Ramirez is Assistant Chief of Endocrinology, Dr. Weare-Regales is a staff endocrinologist, Dr. Foulis is Chief, Pathology Informatics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine service, and Dr. Gomez-Daspet is Chief of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism section, all at the James A. Haley Veterans’ Hospital in Tampa, Florida. Dr. Ramirez and Dr. Weare-Regales are Assistant Professors, and Dr. Gomez-Daspet is Associate Professor and Director of the Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Fellowship Training program, all at University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine in Tampa. Dr. Domingo is a founder and practicing physician at Miami Endocrinology Specialists in Aventura, Florida. Dr. Villafranca is a founder and practicing physician at Team Endocrine in Pembroke Pines, Florida. Dr. Valdez is an endocrinologist at First California Physician Partners in Templeton, California. Dr. Velez is a clinical epidemiology Professor at Facultad de Medicina at Universidad de Antioquia in Medellin, Colombia.
Correspondence: Alejandro Ramirez (alejandro.ramirez@va.gov)
Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.
Background: The prevalence of obesity and diabetes mellitus (DM ) has each increased drastically according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Growth of severe insulin-resistant DM is predicted. U-500 insulin is highly concentrated and can replace less concentrated formulations in patients that need high insulin dosages. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of U-500 and U-100 insulin regimens in veterans with obesity and insulin-resistance.
Methods: A single-site retrospective chart analysis of adult subjects was conducted from July 2002 to June 2011. Data for repeated measures spanned a period from 3 months before the intervention (baseline) through 12 months afterward. The main outcome was the variation in hemoglobin A1C (Hb A1C). Other outcomes included incidence of severe hypoglycemia, weight changes, cardiovascular events, and number of injections.
Results: A total of 142 subjects (68 taking U-500 and 74 taking U-100) were included. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for weight, which was higher among U-500 subjects. Mean Hb A1C was reduced by 0.84% and 0.56% in U-500 and U-100, respectively (P = .003). Severe hypoglycemia occurred in 5 subjects in U-500 and 1 in U-100 ( P = .08). No significant difference was noted in the number of CV events. Mean number of daily injections was 2 in the U-500 group, and 4 in the U-100 group (P < .001).
Conclusions: U-500 insulin compared with U-100 insulin regimens led to a statistically significant reduction in Hb A1C and number of insulin injections. Additional research is necessary to assess the risk of severe hypoglycemia in U-500 users. Neither regimen was associated with increased cardiovascular risk.
More than 70% of Americans are overweight or obese and 1 in 10 has type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In the last 20 years, the prevalence of obesity and DM has each increased drastically according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.1,2 Thus, an increase in severe insulin-resistant DM is predicted. Severe insulin resistance occurs when insulin doses exceed 200 units per day or 2 units/kg per day.3-5 Treating this condition demands large volumes of U-100 insulin and a high frequency of injections (usually 4-7 per day), which can lead to reduced patient adherence.8-10 Likewise, large injected volumes are more painful and can lead to altered absorption.3,9-11
U-500 insulin (500 units/mL) is 5 times more concentrated than U-100 insulin and has advantages in the management of severe insulin-resistant DM.11-13 Its pharmacokinetic profile is unique, for the clinical effect can last for up to 24 hours.4-6 U-500 can replace basal-bolus and other complex insulin regimens, offering convenient, effective glycemic control with 2 or 3 injections per day.11,14-20 U-500 can also improve the quality of life and adherence compared with formulations that require more frequent injections.7,14,21 Historically, only exceptional or “special” cases were treated with U-500, but demand for concentrated insulins has increased in the last decade as clinicians adjust their care for this growing patient population.17
The purpose of this study was to determine whether a population of subjects with severe insulin-resistant T2DM would benefit from the use of U-500 vs U-100 insulin regimens. The hypothesis was that this population would obtain equal or better glycemic control while achieving improved adherence. Other studies have demonstrated that U-500 yields improvements in glycemic control but also potentially increases hypoglycemic episodes.15-18,22-24 To our knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate the clinical outcomes of subjects with severe insulin-resistant T2DM who changed from U-100 to U-500 vs subjects who remained on high-dose U-100 insulin.
This was a single-site, retrospective chart review of subjects with T2DM who attended the endocrinology specialty clinic at the James A. Haley Veterans’ Hospital (JAHVA) in Tampa, Florida, between July 2002 and June 2011. The study included a group of subjects using U-500 insulin and a comparison group using U-100 insulin. The study was approved by the JAHVA Research & Development Committee and by the University of South Florida Institutional Review Board.
Inclusion criteria included diagnosis of T2DM, body mass index (BMI) of more than 30, use of U-500 insulin, or > 200 units daily of U-100 insulin. Exclusion criteria included hypoglycemia unawareness, type 1 DM, and use of an insulin pump. A total of 142 subjects met the inclusion criteria (68 in the U-500 group and 74 in the U-100 group).
All study subjects had at least 1 DM education session. U-500 subjects used insulin vials and 1-mL volumetric hypodermal syringes. All U-500 prescriptions were issued electronically in units and volume (U-500 insulin was available exclusively in vials during the time frame from which data were collected). Subjects in the U-100 group used insulin vials or pen devices. Laboratory studies were processed in house by the institution using high-pressure liquid chromatography to determine hemoglobin A1C (Hb A1C) levels. All study subjects required at least 2 Hb A1C measurements over the observed 12 months for inclusion.
U-500 transition was considered routinely and presented as an option for patients requiring > 200 units of insulin daily. The transition criteria included adherence to medications, follow-up appointments, and glucose monitoring recommendations, and ability to learn and apply insulin self-adjustment instructions. All subjects were given an additional U-500 insulin education session before transition. The endocrinologist calculated all starting doses by reducing the total daily dose by 20%.
In patients with T2DM and ESRD, insulin is the antidiabetic medication of choice with a hemoglobin A1c target of 6 to 8%, using fructosamine...
Patients who were previously antipsychotic-naïve and nondiabetic may be at increased risk of progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus when compared...
Further study of the long-term implications and follow-up is needed on SGLT2 mutation, an uncommon cause of glucosuria that mimics the effect of...