Original Research

Clinical Impact of Initiation of U-500 Insulin vs Continuation of U-100 Insulin in Subjects With Diabetes

Author and Disclosure Information

Background: The prevalence of obesity and diabetes mellitus (DM ) has each increased drastically according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Growth of severe insulin-resistant DM is predicted. U-500 insulin is highly concentrated and can replace less concentrated formulations in patients that need high insulin dosages. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of U-500 and U-100 insulin regimens in veterans with obesity and insulin-resistance.

Methods: A single-site retrospective chart analysis of adult subjects was conducted from July 2002 to June 2011. Data for repeated measures spanned a period from 3 months before the intervention (baseline) through 12 months afterward. The main outcome was the variation in hemoglobin A1C (Hb A1C). Other outcomes included incidence of severe hypoglycemia, weight changes, cardiovascular events, and number of injections.

Results: A total of 142 subjects (68 taking U-500 and 74 taking U-100) were included. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for weight, which was higher among U-500 subjects. Mean Hb A1C was reduced by 0.84% and 0.56% in U-500 and U-100, respectively (P = .003). Severe hypoglycemia occurred in 5 subjects in U-500 and 1 in U-100 ( P = .08). No significant difference was noted in the number of CV events. Mean number of daily injections was 2 in the U-500 group, and 4 in the U-100 group (P < .001).

Conclusions: U-500 insulin compared with U-100 insulin regimens led to a statistically significant reduction in Hb A1C and number of insulin injections. Additional research is necessary to assess the risk of severe hypoglycemia in U-500 users. Neither regimen was associated with increased cardiovascular risk.


 

References

More than 70% of Americans are overweight or obese and 1 in 10 has type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In the last 20 years, the prevalence of obesity and DM has each increased drastically according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.1,2 Thus, an increase in severe insulin-resistant DM is predicted. Severe insulin resistance occurs when insulin doses exceed 200 units per day or 2 units/kg per day.3-5 Treating this condition demands large volumes of U-100 insulin and a high frequency of injections (usually 4-7 per day), which can lead to reduced patient adherence.8-10 Likewise, large injected volumes are more painful and can lead to altered absorption.3,9-11

U-500 insulin (500 units/mL) is 5 times more concentrated than U-100 insulin and has advantages in the management of severe insulin-resistant DM.11-13 Its pharmacokinetic profile is unique, for the clinical effect can last for up to 24 hours.4-6 U-500 can replace basal-bolus and other complex insulin regimens, offering convenient, effective glycemic control with 2 or 3 injections per day.11,14-20 U-500 can also improve the quality of life and adherence compared with formulations that require more frequent injections.7,14,21 Historically, only exceptional or “special” cases were treated with U-500, but demand for concentrated insulins has increased in the last decade as clinicians adjust their care for this growing patient population.17

The purpose of this study was to determine whether a population of subjects with severe insulin-resistant T2DM would benefit from the use of U-500 vs U-100 insulin regimens. The hypothesis was that this population would obtain equal or better glycemic control while achieving improved adherence. Other studies have demonstrated that U-500 yields improvements in glycemic control but also potentially increases hypoglycemic episodes.15-18,22-24 To our knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate the clinical outcomes of subjects with severe insulin-resistant T2DM who changed from U-100 to U-500 vs subjects who remained on high-dose U-100 insulin.

Methods

This was a single-site, retrospective chart review of subjects with T2DM who attended the endocrinology specialty clinic at the James A. Haley Veterans’ Hospital (JAHVA) in Tampa, Florida, between July 2002 and June 2011. The study included a group of subjects using U-500 insulin and a comparison group using U-100 insulin. The study was approved by the JAHVA Research & Development Committee and by the University of South Florida Institutional Review Board.

Inclusion criteria included diagnosis of T2DM, body mass index (BMI) of more than 30, use of U-500 insulin, or > 200 units daily of U-100 insulin. Exclusion criteria included hypoglycemia unawareness, type 1 DM, and use of an insulin pump. A total of 142 subjects met the inclusion criteria (68 in the U-500 group and 74 in the U-100 group).

All study subjects had at least 1 DM education session. U-500 subjects used insulin vials and 1-mL volumetric hypodermal syringes. All U-500 prescriptions were issued electronically in units and volume (U-500 insulin was available exclusively in vials during the time frame from which data were collected). Subjects in the U-100 group used insulin vials or pen devices. Laboratory studies were processed in house by the institution using high-pressure liquid chromatography to determine hemoglobin A1C (Hb A1C) levels. All study subjects required at least 2 Hb A1C measurements over the observed 12 months for inclusion.

Transition to U-500 Insulin

U-500 transition was considered routinely and presented as an option for patients requiring > 200 units of insulin daily. The transition criteria included adherence to medications, follow-up appointments, and glucose monitoring recommendations, and ability to learn and apply insulin self-adjustment instructions. All subjects were given an additional U-500 insulin education session before transition. The endocrinologist calculated all starting doses by reducing the total daily dose by 20%.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Long-term metformin use linked to fewer ER+ breast cancers
Federal Practitioner
Glucosuria Is Not Always Due to Diabetes
Federal Practitioner
Lifestyle coaching for obesity associated with improved cardiometabolic numbers in study
Federal Practitioner
Semaglutide for weight loss? A good first STEP, with caveats
Federal Practitioner
Super Bowl ad for diabetes device prompts debate
Federal Practitioner
Obesity pegged as diabetes cause in almost half of U.S. cases
Federal Practitioner
Thirteen percent of patients with type 2 diabetes have major ECG abnormalities
Federal Practitioner
Big data ‘clinch’ link between high glycemic index diets and CVD
Federal Practitioner
Heart failure redefined with new classifications, staging
Federal Practitioner
Semaglutide for meaningful weight loss in obesity and diabetes?
Federal Practitioner

Related Articles