Original Research

Retrospective Analysis of Liraglutide as Add-On Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Quantifying the Changes in Insulin Requirements

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Methods

We performed a retrospective chart analysis to quantify the benefit of using liraglutide as an add-on therapy to basal and bolus insulin regimens in veterans treated at VA Boston Healthcare System (VABHS). The analysis evaluated changes in insulin doses and HbA1c levels when liraglutide was added to these regimens. Patients identified for the study had electronic medication orders for concurrent therapy with liraglutide, insulin glargine, and insulin aspart filled through outpatient VABHS campus pharmacies for at least 3 months between January 2010 and December 2016. Sixty-nine patients who were on basal-bolus insulin for T2DM and who were prescribed liraglutide for treatment intensification were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were analyzed at baseline and 3 months after liraglutide treatment.

[embed:render:related:node:183912]

Study Protocol

The inclusion criteria were patients aged ≥ 18 years, T2DM diagnosis, and therapy with insulin glargine and insulin aspart for at least 3 months before treatment intensi fication with liraglutide. Exclusion criteria were diagnosis of type 1 DM. To accurately quantify mean change in number of insulin units used, the study included patients only if they had been prescribed insulin glargine and insulin aspart before starting liraglutide. All other insulin regimens were excluded. To detect the true change that occurs when liraglutide is added to basal-bolus insulin, the study also excluded patients if they had been previously prescribed another GLP-1 RA. Patients with contraindications to liraglutide, insulin aspart, or insulin glargine were excluded as well. In addition, patients were excluded from the exposed arm if they were injecting < 1.2 mg of liraglutide once daily or if they had been on liraglutide for < 3 months.

Study Outcomes

All 35 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in this retrospective chart review. The primary outcome was determined by changes in HbA1c level and number of insulin doses 3 months after treatment with liraglutide. For each patient, a chart review was performed to determine the amount of insulin added or reduced during the study period. Data were collected at baseline and 3 months after initiation of liraglutide.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS Version 20.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY). Population characteristics and study outcomes with normal distribution were compared using a paired t test and are reported as means with standard deviations. Nonnormally distributed variables (bolus insulin, HbA1c level) were compared using the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test and are reported as median values with interquartile ranges. Normality was tested with the Shapiro-Wilk test. The primary outcome evaluated was change in number of insulin units used. Secondary outcomes included change in HbA1c level and change in body weight. A Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was used to prevent type I error. Significance at the Bonferroni-corrected level of .01 (.05/5 = .01) is indicated.

Results

Patients were included if they were previously on insulin glargine and insulin aspart before starting liraglutide for treatment intensification.

Although 69 patients matched the initial search, only 35 were included in the analysis owing to insufficient duration of liraglutide therapy (Figure 1). Those patients were not on liraglutide therapy for at least 3 months with HbA1c results to allow for an appropriate analysis.

Recommended Reading

Serious Mental Illness and Its Impact on Diabetes Care in a VA Nurse/Pharmacist-Managed Population (FULL)
Federal Practitioner
Evaluating Management and Change in Glycemic Control After Discontinuation of Metformin in Patients With Elevated Serum Creatinine (FULL)
Federal Practitioner
Concentrated Insulins: A Review and Recommendations (FULL)
Federal Practitioner
Diabetes Programs Aren’t Reaching Their Targets
Federal Practitioner
Smart insoles reduce ‘high-risk’ diabetic foot ulcer recurrence
Federal Practitioner
DPP-4 drugs for diabetes may protect kidneys too
Federal Practitioner
Gastric Banding vs Metformin
Federal Practitioner
Gene Mutation May Lower Cardiometabolic Risk
Federal Practitioner
MVP Data Reveals Gene Mutations Ruling Cholesterol
Federal Practitioner
Cardiologist: Obesity has basically stopped progress on cardiovascular disease
Federal Practitioner

Related Articles