Case Reports

Quality of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-Related Health Care in Rural and Urban Veterans Affairs Clinics

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Data Analysis

Results are described as mean ± standard deviation, median (interquartile range) or proportion, expressed as a percentage as appropriate for the level of measurement and distribution. The proportions meeting the COPD quality of health care outcomes in the urban and rural groups were compared using a chi-square test of proportions, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) on the differences were estimated. Samples of 400 patients each from the rural and urban groups were estimated to provide a 95% 2-sided CI on the differences of about ± 0.05 (5%), assuming the proportion meeting the quality of care outcomes in the urban group would be at least 0.8 (80%).

Results

The authors identified 1,538 patients with a previous encounter diagnosis of COPD who were seen in a primary care clinic in the MVAHCS in March of 2015. The authors reviewed the medical records of 801 randomly selected patients: 400 rural clinic patients and 401 urban clinic patients. Demographic characteristics and major comorbidities of rural and urban patients were similar except more rural patients were white, and fewer had a record of obstructive sleep apnea, alcoholism, or addictive disorders (Table 1). Prescriptions for common chronic medical conditions were similar for rural and urban groups, including medications for depression (31% vs 33%) or diabetes mellitus (25% vs 28%). In patients who had spirometry, the severity of COPD, as assessed by mean forced expiratory volume (FEV1), was similar between rural and urban patients (2.06 L vs 2.10 L).

Quality of COPD Care

Spirometry was documented in fewer rural clinic patients than in urban clinic patients (51% vs 82%; difference 31%, 95% CI: 25% to 37%) (Table 2).

A similar percentage of rural and urban patients had received any pneumonia vaccine (88% vs 91%; difference 3%, 95% CI: -1% to 7%) or an influenza vaccination in the past year (79% vs 81%; difference 3%, 95% CI: -3% to 8%). Prescription rates for SABA (66% vs 68%; difference 3%, 95% CI: -4% to 9%) and long-acting inhalers were similar (61% vs 59%; difference 1%, 95% CI: -5% to 8%).

COPD Outcomes

Home oxygen prescription rates were similar for rural and urban clinic patients (8% vs 9%; difference 1%, 95% CI: -2% to 5%). Rural patients received fewer prescriptions for intermittent oral corticosteroids (17% vs 31%; difference 14%, 95% CI: 9% to 20%) and antibiotics for COPD exacerbations (18% vs 32%; difference 14%, 95% CI: 8% to 20%). Rural patients had fewer ED visits for COPD exacerbations (7% vs 13%; difference 6%, 95% CI: 2% to 10%), and similar admission rates for COPD exacerbations (5% vs 6%; difference 1%, 95% CI: -2% to 4%). Of the few patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbations, none required mechanical ventilation. There was no significant difference in the number of rural vs urban patients seen by a pulmonologist in the calendar year of the study (6% vs 9%; difference 3%, 95% CI:-1% to 6%), with the majority seen by VA providers: 20/24 rural patients and 35/35 urban patients.

Discussion

Fewer rural patients had prior spirometry; otherwise, the COPD-related quality metrics were similar between rural and urban patient groups in the MVAHCS, including immunizations for pneumonia and influenza, and prescribing rates for short- and long-acting inhaler therapy. Despite the similarity in these COPD quality measures, rural clinic patients seemed to have less health care utilization related to COPD exacerbations.

[embed:render:related:node:133372]

Spirometry with airflow obstruction in the presence of respiratory symptoms is required for accurate diagnosis of COPD.3,4 Spirometry has been available at the MVAHCS hospital-based clinic for years. Efforts to address this disparity led to implementation of on-site spirometry at all rural and urban clinics about 2 years prior to the patient enrollment visit date for the study. Fewer rural patients had spirometry, which is possibly from prior disparity in resources; yet rates of spirometry in all patients with a clinical diagnosis of COPD in the MVAHCS are higher (rural 51%, urban 82%) than previously reported. A nationwide study of 94,000 veterans with recent clinical diagnosis of COPD found only 37% had spirometry within 2.5 years of diagnosis,21 and another non-VA study (n = 553) showed only 31% of patients discharged from a hospital with a diagnosis of COPD exacerbation had spirometry performed within a 8-year period prior to hospitalization.22

Annual influenza vaccines are recommended for everyone aged > 6 months, and the pneumonia vaccine is recommended for all patients with COPD in order to reduce the risk of COPD exacerbations and pneumonias.23,24 The rates of vaccination at MVAHCS rural and urban clinics for both influenza (79% vs 81%) and pneumococcus (88% vs 91%) are higher than previously published studies of patients with COPD for influenza vaccination (30%-51%) and pneumonia vaccination (21%-51%) and did not differ between rural and urban clinics.7,25-28 The observed high vaccination rates may be due to EMR prompts and requirements to document vaccination status and offer recommended vaccinations.

Long-acting inhalers have been shown to reduce rates of COPD exacerbations and improve patients’ quality of life.29 The authors found no disparity in the prescription rate of short- or long-acting inhalers between rural and urban patients, and no difference in the severity of COPD, as indicated by FEV1, that might influence prescription rates.

The authors attempted to evaluate health care resource utilization as an indicator of health care quality and outcomes. Based on previous reports, the authors expected to find lower quality of care and increased utilization in rural patients. Previous studies have shown rural patients can be more symptomatic with a higher body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity index (BODE index) than are patients in urban settings.16,30 Statewide and national registry data have shown rural patients have higher rates of primary care visits, ER visits, and hospitalizations for COPD exacerbations.

Rural patients also have been shown to have higher mortality rates and were more likely to be in a long-term care center and less likely to have home care or palliative care than were their urban counterparts.13-18,31 If the severity of illness is similar in rural and urban areas, higher health care utilization related to COPD would suggest that patients in rural settings may be receiving inferior quality of health care. The authors could not find any previous reports of the quality of COPD care delivered in rural vs urban settings.

In this study the only difference in quality of care was the lower proportion of rural patients with a record of spirometry that is needed to confirm the diagnosis. The observed differences in the quality of care measures wouldn’t be expected to lead to large differences in the outcome measures. Contrary to the literature and the observed similarity in quality of care, rural patients had better COPD outcomes perhaps due to unmeasured differences in risk or failure to capture medical visits outside of the VA system. The severity of COPD based on FEV1 and concurrent diagnoses, such as heart failure, did not suggest that rural patients in this comparison had a higher burden of illness or risk of poor COPD outcomes.

More than 70,000 patients spanning a large geographic region receive primary care at MVAHCS, which provides comparable care to all COPD patients, regardless of location, by using the same EMR system, providing evidence-based order sets for disease management, proactively offering on-site and remote COPD case managers for high-risk patients, and more recently, implementing on-site spirometry testing in all clinics. This approach as opposed to the traditional outreach clinic model may in part explain the similarity in quality of care in urban and rural clinics that was not reported in previous studies.

Recommended Reading

Integrating Palliative Care in COPD Treatment
Federal Practitioner
Is It All in the Eye of the Beholder? Comparing Pulmonologists’ and Radiologists’ Performance
Federal Practitioner
New Cancer Data & Trends
Federal Practitioner
Flu vaccine prevented hospitalizations in patients 50 and older
Federal Practitioner
Recurring Bilateral Rash Concomitant With Upper Respiratory Tract Infection in a Healthy Adult Male
Federal Practitioner
Influenza vaccine highly beneficial for people with type 2 diabetes
Federal Practitioner
Oxygen May Not Help Some COPD Patients
Federal Practitioner
When Their Job Puts Workers at Risk for Asthma
Federal Practitioner
Management of Asthma in the Military
Federal Practitioner
COPD Data Trends
Federal Practitioner

Related Articles