Letters from Maine

File it under fiction


 

References

Doctors once received a free pass when it came to penmanship. We wrote our prescriptions in Latin. So, it was okay that everything else we scribbled looked like Greek. Referrals and consultations occurred in hospital corridors or doctors’ lounges. Documentation was spotty if it happened at all. Our handwriting was a joke. As long as we could sort of decipher our own scribbling, that was okay. But, the laughing stopped when third-party payers began to ask for proof that they were getting their money’s worth for our services – a proof that they could read.

Dictation with transcription was the obvious solution. It was efficient and produced a legible result. Whatever was lost in transcription resulted in humorous and usually harmless errors. As a card-carrying cheapskate, I typed my own letters. My typos added a kind of homey touch to my communications, and they were certainly more readable than my scrawl.

Dr. William G. Wilkoff

Dictated and transcribed reports seemed to be a relatively accurate reflection of what had occurred at an office visit, and it kept the payers happy for a while. Most physicians continued to handwrite their office notes. But, it was clear that handwriting was coming off the walls. Insurance companies, the government, quality control folks, and risk assessment managers all wanted more documentation. Computerization seemed to offer a reasonable compromise. The payers got the data, and physicians could take advantage of the efficiencies that electronic records promised.

The software vendors’ sales pitch went like this, "Doc, aren’t most of your visits pretty much the same? History, physical, lab, diagnosis, plan? And, you do pretty much the same exam on everyone? And most of the stuff is normal, right? We’ll show you how to make some templates that will save you a ton of time without all that repetition – done in just a couple of mouse clicks."

So, the templates were made, sometimes with the physician’s help, but often without. And accuracy was sacrificed in the name of legibility and efficiency. The problem is that patients with the same diagnosis aren’t all the same. Their examinations are as different as snowflakes.

Pages

Recommended Reading

The Medical Roundtable: The HDL Quandary
MDedge Family Medicine
ESHRE writes first premature ovarian insufficiency guidelines
MDedge Family Medicine
Benefits outweigh harms of aspirin therapy
MDedge Family Medicine
Guideline for overactive bladder adds new treatments
MDedge Family Medicine
Robin Williams’s suspected suicide could encourage others to get help
MDedge Family Medicine
Quick freezing oocytes and embryos transforms assisted reproduction
MDedge Family Medicine
Summary of evidence-based guideline: complementary and alternative medicine in multiple sclerosis. Report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology
MDedge Family Medicine
Twin study confirmed genetic basis of several epilepsy syndromes
MDedge Family Medicine
Pregnancy exposure registries confirmed useful in assessing product safety
MDedge Family Medicine
Why EHRs are not the face of digital health technology
MDedge Family Medicine