OBJECTIVES: Infections with group A streptococcus (GAS) occur in 10% to 20% of patients with sore throats, whereas antibiotics are prescribed 50% of the time. Clinical scoring rules can more accurately predict the likelihood of GAS infection, but whether family physicians will adopt such approaches is unclear. This study sought to determine whether repeated clinical prompts to use a scoring approach could help family physicians lower antibiotic use in patients with a sore throat.
STUDY DESIGN: Randomized trial in which physicians were assigned to use either (1) chart stickers that prompted them to calculate a score based on clinical findings and provided management recommendations linked to score totals or (2) a clinical checklist.
POPULATION: Ninety-seven family physicians in Ontario, Canada, assessed 621 children and adults with sore throat and obtained a throat swab for culture.
OUTCOMES MEASURED: (1) Unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions given to patients with a negative throat culture and (2) overall antibiotic use.
RESULTS: There were no differences between the control and intervention group in unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions (16.1% vs 20.4%, respectively, P = .29) or overall antibiotic use (27.9% vs 28.1%, P = .97). However, a number of physicians dropped out of the study; as a result, the characteristics of the physicians in the 2 groups were dissimilar in factors related to prescribing. After adjusting for these differences and patient clustering by physician, the odds ratio for the effect of the intervention on unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.42, 1.40) and 0.57 for overall antibiotic use (95% CI = 0.27, 1.17).
CONCLUSIONS: Chart prompts during clinical encounters to use a clinical score in the assessment of patients with a sore throat did not reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing by family physicians. The problems encountered in conducting this community-based intervention trial are discussed in relation to the negative result.
- Repeated chart prompts to use a clinical prediction rule for the management of children and adults with a sore throat did not help family physicians decrease unnecessary antibiotic use.
- Several problems in the conduct of this community-based intervention trial rather than a lack of the effectiveness of the intervention may have contributed to the negative result.
In the past decade, bacterial resistance to commonly used antibiotics has risen dramatically.1,2 While a number of factors have contributed to this problem, overuse of antibiotics by physicians has been implicated.3-6 An association has been demonstrated between the volume of antibiotic prescriptions and bacterial resistance at both a national4,5 and a local level.3 Where prescribing by physicians has been reduced, rates of antibiotic resistance have subsequently been observed to decline.5,6 As a result, physicians have been urged to reduce their use of antibiotics.7,8 Respiratory infections are the most common reason for the prescribing of antibiotics.9 Upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) and pharyngitis account for 19% to 28% of all antibiotic prescriptions written by family physicians.9-11
While the use of antibiotics for URTI with sore throat is frequently debated,12-14 experts continue to recommend such treatment for group A streptococcus (GAS) infections to prevent rheumatic fever.15,16 However, only 10% to 20% of patients with a sore throat who visit a family physician have a GAS infection,17-19 whereas antibiotics are prescribed for 50% of URTIs10 and 90% of cases of tonsillitis.20 Uncertainty as to whether or not a bacterial infection is present and clinical error in estimating the likelihood of a GAS infection are associated with the unnecessary prescription of antibiotics.21,22 To address clinical uncertainty, a number of prediction rules and clinical scores have been proposed.23-30 However, physicians taught simply to generate more accurate estimates of the likelihood of a strep infection in this manner do not necessarily lower their use of antibiotics.31
We have previously shown that linking score estimates for the likelihood of a GAS infection to explicit management recommendations to take a throat swab or prescribe an antibiotic has the potential to lower antibiotic use significantly.19,32 In an observational study involving 621 children and adults, this approach would have reduced unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions by 63%.32 We also found a trend toward reduced antibiotic use when physicians were provided with an explicit reminder about the score approach.33 As a result, we hypothesized that this might also help physicians to learn to adopt the sore throat score approach. Reminders have been found to improve the delivery of preventive health services.34,35 The objective of this study was to determine whether repeated clinical prompts to community-based family physicians about the score approach could reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions and lower overall antibiotic use for patients with a sore throat.