Commentary

20 years later, not much has changed


 

A basic universal health care package for every US citizen was at the top of Dr. Susman’s 2012 health care wish list (Editorial, J Fam Pract. 2012;61:8). Ironically, it was No. 1 on my list, as well, when I wrote the following for Kansas Medicine in 1992:

“Universal access does not imply access to all health care, but to basic health care which includes disease prevention and health promotion, treatment of acute illness and injury, management of chronic illness, and comfort care for the preterminal and terminal patient.”1 By reducing the cost of administrative waste, unnecessary care, and sometimes overpriced care, I added, we might find the money to cover basic—and reasonably beneficial—care for all.

It is painful to realize that citizens of all other industrialized nations already enjoy universal health coverage. People in these countries realize their systems aren’t perfect, but absolutely don’t want ours. Often, they’re appalled to learn that some Americans don’t get needed care because of financial issues and others are forced into bankruptcy because of health care charges.

There were just 4 items on the list I wrote 20 years ago. The 3 detailed below, like the first one, are issues our nation still faces today.

Public support for health care. My point was that tax dollars should become a larger source of funding for health care services—with a CEO contributing more than a janitor. Although it is getting more expensive to provide care for seniors, it is unlikely that our country will ever move away from tax-funded support of health care for the current Medicare and Medicaid populations.

Equitable physician payment. In the 20 years since I wrote that, little has been done to level the playing field between primary care physicians and specialists. Population-based studies reveal that health outcomes are best in systems founded on strong generalist physician care. Physician training and reimbursement schedules must change to produce a strong base of generalist physicians.

Professional liability reform. This may be even more important now as we strive to provide cost-effective care amid a flood of unnecessary studies ordered in a poorly thought-out effort to help ensure that we don’t end up in malpractice court.

The practice of medicine is harder today than it was 20 years ago. But the opportunity to sometimes cure and always care for our patients still makes me happy to get up and go to work every day.

Larry Anderson, MD
Wellington, Kan

Reference

1. Anderson L. Health care reform: a ‘consciously incremental approach.’ Kans Med. 1992;93:103-104.

Recommended Reading

Half of Younger Family Physicians Are Women
MDedge Family Medicine
AMA and AT&T Merge Online Portals
MDedge Family Medicine
UPDATED: Feds Promise Flexibility for Meaningful Use Stage 2
MDedge Family Medicine
Feds' Pre-Existing Plan Covers 50,000 Previously Uninsured
MDedge Family Medicine
Racial, Ethnic Disparities Seen in Cancer Burden
MDedge Family Medicine
PCORI Urged to Focus on High-Cost, High-Impact Procedures
MDedge Family Medicine
At Sanford Health, Doctors 'Walk the Walk' With Their Patients
MDedge Family Medicine
Panel Explores Hepatitis B Protection Strategies for Providers
MDedge Family Medicine
IOM Report: Long-term Drug Safety Data Needed in Children
MDedge Family Medicine
Staffing Tops Money as Biggest IT Barrier
MDedge Family Medicine