TABLE 1
Aberrant drug-related behavior: Red flags13-15
Use of opioids for non-analgesic indications |
Lack of control (related to drug use or to patient behavior) |
Compulsive use of medications |
Continued use of drugs despite harm/lack of benefit |
Cravings |
Escalation of drug use |
Selling/altering prescriptions |
Theft or diversion |
Request for early refills |
Claims of “lost” prescriptions |
Reluctance to try nonpharmacologic options |
Use of multiple prescribers or pharmacies |
Odd stories regarding need for medication |
Reporting vague medical history or textbook symptoms |
Unwillingness to name regular physician |
No interest in a physical exam, diagnostic testing, or providing past records |
Request for specific drug(s) |
Extensive (or very limited) understanding of medications |
Calling or arriving after hours or when regular doctor is unavailable |
Insistence on being seen urgently (eg, because of being late for another appointment) |
When to test, what to test for
No guidelines specify when to test, but testing upon initiation of chronic opioid treatment, followed by random testing, is the most widely used strategy. Unobserved specimen collection is generally acceptable,13 provided the specimens are requested at random rather than routinely at every visit.
Initial testing is done using an immuno-assay drug panel.13,18 TABLE 2 lists the drugs most commonly included in a standard urine test. However, the drug panel can vary from 1 laboratory to another, as can the lower limits of drug detection. No-threshold testing is mentioned in pain management literature, but is not often available in clinical practice.
Before initiating UDT, it is important to know which drugs the laboratory you use routinely tests for and what its lower limits are. The simplest way to find out is to ask lab personnel.
CASE 1 At her first visit, Marilyn H’s new physician focuses on controlling her blood sugar and blood pressure, ordering follow-up testing of the lung nodule, and refilling her hydrocodone and alprazolam prescriptions. The physician requests the patient’s medical records and orders a urine drug screen per clinic protocol, testing for benzodiazepines as well as for opioids. He gives his patient prescriptions for a 1-month supply of both drugs while the UDT results are pending.
The lab report comes in the following day, and indicates that Marilyn tested positive for cocaine but negative for other substances, including narcotics and benzodiazepines. The clinic immediately notifies the pharmacy to confiscate the patient’s new prescriptions when she presents them and calls Marilyn, advising her that she will not be given any further prescriptions for controlled substances.
The physician refers the patient to a pain clinic, gives her the number of a substance abuse treatment center, and encourages her to follow up at the clinic for other medical issues. Marilyn fails to keep her appointment at the pain clinic and does not respond to a subsequent call.
TABLE 2
A standard urine drug test panel13,18
Amphetamines |
Cocaine |
Marijuana (THC) |
Opiates (morphine and codeine) |
Phencyclidine |
THC, tetrahydrocannabinol. |
Talking to patients about drug testing
Physicians are often concerned about patients’ feelings about drug testing—worrying that patients may not feel trusted or respected by a doctor who asks them to submit to UDT. Others may fear that the mere mention of urine testing will encourage patients to misuse prescription opioids, that patients will view UDT as a punitive measure, or that those being tested will believe that the physician is more concerned with self-protection than with providing optimal care to the patient.
Making UDT routine. One way to circumvent such possibilities is to implement a systematic approach to drug testing. We recommend that physicians discuss the role of UDT in the initial education session with patients being started on a course of opiates. Describing UDT as simply another routine monitoring parameter—akin to the measure of microalbuminuria for patients with diabetes—can decrease or eliminate the stigma associated with drug testing.
CASE 2 A new policy encouraging UDT for all patients on chronic controlled substances has just been implemented at the clinic where Don F is being treated. His physician tells him about the policy, and a urine test is ordered at his next visit. The test comes back negative for all substances, including opioids.
When presented with the results over the phone, Don insists that he regularly takes his prescription medication, and makes a same-day appointment to discuss the results with his physician.
Interpreting test results— what UDT can (and can’t) reveal
To avoid eroding trust by falsely accusing a patient of diversion or use of an illicit substance, it’s important to familiarize yourself with testing limitations. Factors that can affect the results, and may interfere with the ability of UDT to provide a definitive picture, include: