PURLs

Suspect an eating disorder? Suggest CBT

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

CAVEATS: Limited wait time leaves unanswered questions

One limitation of this study is the lack of a control group beyond the 8-week waiting period. Prior studies of CBT for bulimia that delayed therapy for those in the control groups for a longer duration have consistently shown that patients receiving CBT did significantly better than those in the control group.9 While a “no treatment” group would have made the results more robust in this case, it would not have been ethical to withhold treatment for the entire length of the study.

It is noteworthy, too, that this study only included patients with a BMI >17.5. Patients with a diagnosis of anorexia nervosa, who by definition have a lower BMI, will need other treatments, including hospitalization in some cases.

CHALLENGES TO IMPLEMENTATION: Identifying patients and therapists

The primary challenge is to determine which of your patients have eating disorders. When discussing diet, adding a simple question such as, “Are you happy with your current weight?” can help you identify those who meet the criteria for an eating disorder or are at high risk.3

Identifying local mental health providers who are trained to provide CBT for patients with eating disorders is another concern. Insurance coverage for this intensive treatment may also be a limiting factor in some cases.

Many studies support the use of fluoxetine for patients with bulimia, and combined treatment with SSRIs and CBT has been shown to be superior to either treatment alone.8,10,14 Consider starting the patient on an antidepressant while she (or he) awaits the start of CBT.

Acknowledgements

The PURLs Surveillance System is supported in part by Grant Number UL1RR024999 from the National Center for Research Resources, a Clinical Translational Science Award to the University of Chicago. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Center for Research Resources or the National Institutes of Health.

PURLs methodology

This study was selected and evaluated using FPIN’s Priority Updates from the Research Literature (PURLs) Surveillance System methodology. The criteria and findings leading to the selection of this study as a PURL can be accessed at www.jfponline.com/purls.

Pages

Copyright © 2009 The Family Physicians Inquiries Network.
All rights reserved.

Online-Only Materials

AttachmentSize
PDF icon JFP05805265_methodology142.37 KB

Recommended Reading

Physical Activity Offset Effect of 'Obesity Genes'
MDedge Family Medicine
Taking the Stairs at Work Is a Leg Up for a Healthier Heart
MDedge Family Medicine
Merck Drops Taranabant, Cites Psychiatric Side Effect Profile
MDedge Family Medicine
Sibutramine's Weight Maintenance Lasts 2 Years
MDedge Family Medicine
Liraglutide Beat Orlistat for Losing Weight
MDedge Family Medicine
Obese Lose 14% of Weight on Novel Combo Drug
MDedge Family Medicine
Meal Replacements Double Weight Loss, Support Maintenance
MDedge Family Medicine
Pediatric Obesity Clinics Impress, but at a Price
MDedge Family Medicine
Obese Dyslipidemic Children Have 'Vascular Age' of Adults
MDedge Family Medicine
Lifestyle Trumps Bariatric Surgery in Long Term
MDedge Family Medicine