EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER
Interventions that include a combination of behavioral and lifestyle modifications—including decreased caloric intake, specific aids to changing diet, increased physical activity, and treatment of binge eating disorders—have modest benefit with appropriate use (strength of recommendation [SOR]: A, based on multiple randomized controlled trials). Hypnosis can be used as an adjunct to behavioral therapy for weight loss (SOR: A, based on systematic reviews).
CLINICAL COMMENTARY
More options for the patient is better: physician, dietician, counselor, trainer
Jon O. Neher, MD
Valley Medical Center, Renton, Wash
More options for the patient is better: physician, dietician, counselor, trainer Working against the cultural incentives that promote obesity is difficult, and doing so places physicians in the challenging position of trying to change culture one patient at a time. A good team is essential, and it seems the more options the better: physician, dietician, counselor (perhaps with hypnosis skills), and even a physical trainer. Funding for these services, as well as patient motivation for change, are often easier to obtain when the physician labels the patient as having a disease (such as diabetes or hyperlipidemia). Unfortunately, the rising prevalence of the metabolic syndrome is making this situation increasingly common.
Evidence summary
Obesity rates in the US have risen significantly in recent years: 30% of US adults (60 million people) and 16% of children 6 to 19 years old (more than 9 million), are obese,1 and trends suggest rates will continue to increase. Eating behaviors are learned and reinforced within families, peer groups, and other important social groups. Behavioral techniques to treat obesity attempt to reduce reinforcement for unhealthy eating behaviors and teach and reinforce healthy eating behaviors. Cue avoidance is a common behavioral intervention: the patient avoids situations in which he has overeaten in the past, such as “all-you-can-eat” buffets. Role play to practice restraint from overeating, or to resist social pressure to eat at an open buffet, uses cognitive therapy as a behavioral technique. Involving family members in an obesity treatment plan and using group therapy such as Overeaters Anonymous are other standard behavioral techniques.
A 1997 systematic review of 99 weight loss studies, including randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials of at least 1 year’s duration, found 21 behavioral intervention trials that included dietary, exercise, and behavioral approaches.2 The reviewers concluded that long-term behavioral techniques, dietary changes with very specific instructions to assist adherence, exercise, relapse prevention training, and social/community support were optimal for promoting weight loss.2
One of the RCTs3 involved 163 patients and compared behavioral therapy alone with behavioral therapy plus specific aids to changing diet: use of grocery lists, meal plans, and specific instructions to reduce total fat intake. The average weight loss after 1 year in the behavioral therapy with specific aids group, was statistically significantly greater than the weight loss in the behavioral therapy alone group (6.9 kg vs 3.3 kg).3
Another RCT4 in the review evaluated different types of maintenance programs to promote ongoing weight loss among 125 people randomized to 1 of 5 maintenance programs after an initial 20-week behavioral weight loss program: 1) control—no further contact with the behavioral therapists; 2) behavioral—ongoing problem-solving behavioral therapy sessions; 3) social—peer support and participant presentations, with some financial incentives; 4) exercise—therapy sessions, as in group 2, plus an aerobic exercise program; and 5) combined—using therapy sessions, social support and an exercise program. Mean weight loss at 1.8 months for the 4 intervention programs was significantly greater than for the control (group 2, 11.4 kg; group 3, 8.4 kg; group 4, 9.1 kg; group 5, 13.5 kg vs 3.6 kg).4 Two additional similar RCTs5,6 showed significant benefit from behavioral interventions combined with social support and relapse prevention training.
One RCT7 addressed both behavioral therapy and the importance of face-to-face interaction. The study randomized 122 subjects to either Internet video sessions biweekly with a therapist (which included behavioral therapy, access to an associated chat room and e-mail correspondence), or to biweekly face-to-face sessions with a therapist. The active intervention spanned 24 weeks, but the therapist met with the face-to-face group and interacted in the chat room and with e-mail for another 6 months. At 18 months, the mean weight loss in the Internet group was 5.7 kg compared with 10.4 kg in the face-to-face group.7 In a subsequent data analysis,4 regular attendance to follow-up group sessions for at least 1 year resulted in better maintenance of weight loss. Initial weight loss—ie, weight loss in the first few months of the behavioral intervention—was a good predictor of long-term adherence to behavioral interventions.8