Introducing Telemedicine Technology to Rural Physicians and Settings

,

Original Research

Introducing Telemedicine Technology to Rural Physicians and Settings

J Fam Pract. 2001 May;50(5):419-424

References

1. Perednia DA, Allen A. Telemedicine technology and clinical applications. JAMA 1995;273:483-88.

2. Gallagher K, McFarland MA. The wired physician: current clinical information on the Internet. Mo Med 1996;93:334-39.

3. Engstrom P. Can you afford not to travel the Internet? Med Econ 1996;73:172-74.

4. Pareras LG, Martin-Rodriguez JG. Neurosurgery and the Internet: a critical analysis and a review of available resources. Neurosurgery 1996;39:216-32.

5. Neill RA, Mainous AG, III, Clark JR, Hagen MD. The utility of electronic mail as a medium for patient-physician communication. Arch Fam Med 1994;3:268-71.

6. Green L. A better way to keep in touch with patients. Med Econ 1996;73:153-54.

7. Norton SA, Burdick AE, Phillips CM, Berman B. Teledermatology and underserved populations [published erratum appears in Arch Dermatol 1997; 133:819]. Arch Dermatol 1997;133:197-200.

8. Menn ER, Kvedar JC. Teledermatology in a changing health care environment. Telemed J 1995;1:303-08.

9. High WA, Houston MS, Calobrisi SD, Drage LA, McEvoy MT. Assessment of the accuracy of low-cost store-and-forward teledermatology consultation. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000;42:776-83.

10. Callahan EJ, Hilty DM, Nesbitt TS. Patient satisfaction with telemedicine consultation in primary care: comparison of ratings of medical and mental health applications. Telemed J 1998;4:363-69.

11. Cukor P, Baer L, Willis BS, et al. Use of videophones and low-cost standard telephone lines to provide a social presence in telepsychiatry. Telemed J 1998;4:313-21.

12. Ball C, McLaren P. The tele-assessment of cognitive state: a review. J Telemed Telecare 1997;3:126-31.

13. Graham MA. Telepsychiatry in Appalachia. Am Behav Sci 1996;39:602-15.

14. Baer L, Cukor P, Jenike MA, Leahy L, O’Laughlen J, Coyle JT. Pilot studies of telemedicine for patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1995;152:1383-85.

15. Brown FW. A survey of telepsychiatry in the USA. J Telemed Telecare 1995;1:19-21.

16. Pacht ER, Turner JW, Gailiun M, et al. Effectiveness of telemedicine in the outpatient pulmonary clinic. Telemed J 1998;4:287-92.

17. Tsagaris MJ, Papavassiliou MV, Chatzipantazi PD, et al. The contribution of telemedicine to cardiology. J Telemed Telecare 1997;3(suppl):63-64.

18. Afset JE, Lunde P, Rasmussen K. Accuracy of routine echocardiographic measurements made by an inexperienced examiner through tele-instruction. J Telemed Telecare 1996;2:148-54.

19. Grigsby J, Kaehny MM, Sandberg EJ, Schlenker RE, Shaughnessy PW. Effects and effectiveness of telemedicine. Health Care Financ Rev 1995;17:115-31.

20. Bergmo TS. An economic analysis of teleconsultation in otorhinolaryngology. J Telemed Telecare 1997;3:194-99.

21. Folberg R, Linberg JV, Verdick RE, Weingeist TA. Distance education for the professional: the Web and beyond. Opthalmol Clin North Am 2000;13:225-37.

22. Mair F, Whitten P. Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine. BMJ 2000;320:1517-20.

23. Conte SJ, Imershein AW, Magill MK. Rural community and physician perspectives on resource factors affecting physician retention. J Rural Health 1992;8:185-96.

24. Harned MA. The saga of rural health care. W V Med J 1993;89:54-55.

25. Mackesy R. Physician satisfaction with rural hospital. Hosp Health Serv Adm 1993;38:375-86.

26. Anderson EA, Bergeron D, Crouse BJ. Recruitment of family physicians in rural practice. Minn Med 1994;77:29-32.

27. Harris KD. Acceptance of computer-based telemedicine in three rural Missouri counties (rural health care). Thesis/dissertation. University of Missouri; 1999.

28. Orkin FK. Rural realities. Anesthesiology 1998;88:568-71.

29. Mazmanian PE, Banks RA, Self P, Hampton C. Increasing access to medical information. Changing communication patterns in southside Virginia. Va Med Q 1996;123:176-78.

30. Menduno M. Prognosis: wired. Why Internet technology is the next medical breakthrough. Hosp Health Netw 1998;72:28-30.

31. Treister NW. Physician acceptance of new medical information systems: the field of dreams. Physician Exec 1998;24:20-24.

32. Appleby C. Web-o-matic isn’t automatic—yet. Internet technology hasn’t broken the barrier between doctors & computers. Hosp Health Netw 1997;71:30-31.

33. Keoun B. At last, doctors begin to jump online. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88:1610-12.

34. Chi-Lum BI, Lundberg GD, Silberg WM. Physicians accessing the Internet, the PAI Project. An educational initiative. JAMA 1996;275:1361-62.

35. Bergman R. The computer revolution snags some physicians in & out of the office: it’s time to recognize the new era of the techno docs. Hosp Health Netw 1995;69:68-70.

36. Gleiner JA. Information technology: the next wave. Clinician acceptance of information technology. Physician Exec 1996;22:4-8.

37. Greco PJ, Eisenberg JM. Changing physicians’ practices. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1271-73.

38. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Changing physician performance: a systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA 1995;274:700-05.

39. Robertson N, Baker R, Hearnshaw H. Changing the clinical behavior of doctors: a psychological framework. Qual Health Care 1996;5:51-54.

40. Nobel J. Influence of physician perceptions on putting knowledge into practice. Lancet 1996;347:1571.-

41. Crabtree BF, Miller WL, eds. Doing qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1999.

42. The ethnograph Version 4.0. Amherst, Mass: Qualis Research Associates; 1994.

43. Crabtree BF, Miller WL. A template approach to text analysis: developing and using codebooks. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL, eds. Doing qualitative research. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications; 1992;93-109

44. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1994.

45. Boyatzis RE. Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1998.

46. Yellowlees P. Successful development of telemedicine systems—seven core principles. J Telemed Telecare 1997;3:215-22.

47. Carlson B. Telemedicine changing practice of medicine. Indiana Med 1994;87:352-59.

48. Leckie GJ, Pettigrew KE, Sylvain C. Modeling the information seeking of professionals: a general model derived from research on engineers, health care professionals, and lawyers. Library Q 1996;66:161-93.

49. Gibbons B. How do we make managed care work for us? Tate Rural Health Watch 1998;2-3,8-9,12.-

50. Kanter RM. The new managerial work. Harv Bus Rev 1989;67:85-92.

51. Beer M, Eisenstat RA, Spector B. Why change programs don’t produce change. Harv Bus Rev 1990;68:158-66.

52. Kotter JP. Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. Harv Bus Rev 1995;73:59-67.

53. Heydt S. Helping physicians cope with change. Physician Exec 1999;25:40-45.

54. Schneider B, Gunnarson SK, Nilesjolly K. Creating the climate and culture of success. Organizational Dynamics 1994;23:17-22.

Implementation strategies need to be tailored to the environmental conditions of practice sites that are carefully chosen for their potential to cultivate telemedicine. Successful sites can become exemplars to others. Establishing relationships with a practice site, however, begins with diplomatic negotiation that is sensitive to local conditions. A commitment must be made to nurture the relationship.

Limitations

The strength of our study lies in the initial investigation of rural health care providers’ perceptions of telemedicine, and we are not aware of any similar qualitative studies in the literature. The results of our study are limited, however, to the recent introduction of telemedicine technologies into rural settings. We presented perceptions of providers who were just beginning to adjust to new technologies. Future research is needed to determine the extent of these perceptions among rural health care providers in general and in particular whether some of the negative perceptions of telemedicine of the providers in our study will change over time.

Conclusions

Rural health care providers and administrators consider a range of factors, including economic ramifications, efficacy, social pressure, and apprehension, in deciding whether and how fast to adopt telemedicine technology. Since adopting this technology can be a major change, agencies trying to introduce it into rural areas should take all these factors into account in their approach to rural health care providers, staff, and communities.

Acknowledgments

Our study was funded by the National Library of Medicine, contract number: NO1-LM-6-3538.

Related resources

Telemedicine Information Exchange (TIE) A National Library of Medicine-funded web page which offers comprehensive information on telemedicine and telehealth. http://tie.telemed.org
Telemedicine And Health Care Informatics Legal Issues Web site A resource for providers, lawyers, professionals or anyone interested in learning more about health care law and, more specifically, the regulatory and transactional aspects of health care. http://www.netreach.net