PURLs

A new standard for treatment of torus fractures of the wrist?

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

De-escalation of treatment offers an equivalent, resource-sparing alternative to traditional treatment of pediatric torus fractures of the distal radius.

By the primary end point of 3 days, 36 patients (7%) in the soft bandage group returned to medical care requesting a change to rigid immobilization, compared with 1 patient (0.2%) in the rigid immobilization group declining intervention.

WHAT’S NEW

Equivalence in pain and function scores

This trial showed equivalence in pain at 3 days’ follow-up in children with distal radius torus fractures who were offered bandaging and then immediately discharged from the ED, compared with rigid immobilization and clinical follow-up. There were no significant differences in pain or function between groups during the 6 weeks following the initial injury. De-escalation of treatment offers an equivalent, resource-sparing alternative to traditional treatment of these fractures.

CAVEATS

Lack of masking likely introduced bias

There are no major caveats associated with managing distal radius torus fractures with a soft bandage and discharge from the ED, compared with the traditional treatment of rigid immobilization. However, bias was likely introduced in patient-reported outcomes due to the inability to mask patients and families to the treatment allocation. This may have led to overstating the severity of outcomes in the bandage group, given the strong preference for rigid immobilization, although equivalence was illustrated despite this potential bias.

CHALLENGES TO IMPLEMENTATION

Preferences may be difficult to change

Parents and clinicians demonstrated a preference for rigid immobilization, as shown in the imbalance in treatment crossovers, with 7% of children changing to the rigid immobilization group by the primary study end point of 3 days. The study authors hypothesized that crossovers may have been due to the perception by some parents that rigid immobilization is the gold standard of treatment, as well as clinicians’ seeking to escalate care for patients returning for follow-up. Policy and guideline changes, as well as physician efforts to educate patients on outcomes with soft bandage treatment, are likely to improve these misconceptions.

Pages

Copyright © 2023. The Family Physicians Inquiries Network. All rights reserved.

Online-Only Materials

AttachmentSize
PDF icon jfp07211383_methodology.pdf139.86 KB

Recommended Reading

AAP: ‘Toddler milk’ unnecessary for most kids
MDedge Family Medicine
Massive databases unleash discovery, but not so much in the U.S.
MDedge Family Medicine
Semaglutide prescribing surged in the past year
MDedge Family Medicine
Survey finds oral minoxidil shortage in Washington-area pharmacies
MDedge Family Medicine
Body dysmorphic disorder diagnosis guidelines completed in Europe
MDedge Family Medicine
Studies address primary care oral health screening and prevention for children
MDedge Family Medicine
Essential oils: How safe? How effective?
MDedge Family Medicine
Standing BP measures improve hypertension diagnosis
MDedge Family Medicine
Renewing the dream
MDedge Family Medicine
An FP’s guide to caring for patients with seizure and epilepsy
MDedge Family Medicine