Clinical Inquiries

Are SERMs safe and effective for the treatment of hypogonadism in men?

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

All active treatment groups showed increases in testosterone level during treatment (P < .001); however, FSH and LH levels increased in the EC group and decreased in the testosterone gel group (P < .001). Serum testosterone levels improved to 428.8 ng/dL (95% CI, 395-462) and 368.8 ng/dL (95% CI, 307-431), respectively, in the combined EC and testosterone gel groups at 16 weeks. Of note, total testosterone levels after cessation of treatment (off-drug point) rapidly decreased below baseline in the testosterone gel group compared to the pooled EC group, which remained elevated above baseline for at least 7 days.

Composite end-point analysis was performed, with success considered if men achieved both testosterone in normal range (300-1040 ng/dL) and sperm concentrations ≥ 10 × 106. The pooled data studies showed EC was more successful than testosterone gel in achieving both endpoints (63.5% vs 24.7%; P < .001). No difference in the incidence of treatment-related adverse effects between groups was noted.

There were no major adverse effects, even after 3+ years of treatment

A 2019 retrospective cohort study of 400 men treated for symptomatic hypogonadism with CC sought to determine if improvements in testosterone, hypogonadal symptoms, and adverse effects were similar for those treated for ≤ 3 years (n = 280) and those treated for > 3 years (n = 120).5 Outcomes included serum testosterone and estradiol levels, symptom improvement (by qADAM questionnaire), and adverse effects.

All participants had a baseline testosterone level < 300 ng/dL, and all participants received CC therapy. Men received 25 mg/d with titration to 50 mg/d when testosterone did not improve to ≥ 300 ng/dL after 4 weeks.

When comparing outcomes across the 2 groups, there were no significant differences. Serum testosterone levels improved to 579 ng/dL (95% CI, 554-605) and 542 ng/dL (95% CI, 504-580) in the ≤ 3 years and > 3 years groups, respectively. Meanwhile, 79% of men in the ≤ 3 years group reported symptom improvement (improvement in libido, erection, or 3 other of the 10 domains of the qADAM questionnaire), while 77% of those in the > 3 years group reported improvement (P = .60).

Continue to: Finally, the percentage of men reporting...

Pages

Evidence-based answers from the Family Physicians Inquiries Network

Recommended Reading

Cancer-related thyroidectomy linked to increased diabetes risk
MDedge Family Medicine
Inadequate routine diabetes screening common in HIV
MDedge Family Medicine
ADA standards of care 2022: Screen more, personalize, use technology
MDedge Family Medicine
FDA approves levoketoconazole for Cushing syndrome
MDedge Family Medicine
Benign adrenal tumors linked to hypertension, type 2 diabetes
MDedge Family Medicine
Medicare expands coverage of continuous glucose monitoring devices for diabetes
MDedge Family Medicine
COVID-19 linked to increased diabetes risk in youth
MDedge Family Medicine
AHA advice for diabetes patients to stay heart healthy
MDedge Family Medicine
How safe is a drug holiday from bisphosphonates for osteoporosis?
MDedge Family Medicine
Preschool boys’ behaviors traced back to moms’ thyroid hormones
MDedge Family Medicine