ReedGroup, Ltd. (Ms. Wizner and Dr. Gaspar); Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, MA (Dr. Berenji); Webility Corporation, Wayland, MA (Dr. Christian). Dr. Harrell is an independent researcher, San Diego, CA. kerri.wizner@mdguidelines.com
Ms. Wizner and Dr. Gaspar are employees of ReedGroup, Ltd., which publishes disability duration guidelines and the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine evidence-based medical treatment guidelines.
Drs. Harrell, Berenji, and Christian reported no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article.
Utilize established guidelines.A tactic that can make it easier to discuss return to work with patients is to rely on an independent and authoritative reference set of codified disability duration guidelines, which, typically, can be searched by diagnosis, procedure, or presenting symptoms. Such guidelines provide a condition-specific expected duration of work disability in the form of number of days, with shortest, typical, and maximum durations for different levels of job demands. If necessary, you can then adjust the guideline’s estimated duration to account for the patient’s age, underlying state of health, comorbidities, and so forth.
The use of disability duration guidelines at the point of care can facilitate the process of setting early and appropriate expectations for a patient’s recovery. If a patient is confrontational in response to your recommendation on the duration of work disability, guidelines can be used to address specific objections and facilitate understanding of functional recovery.
Consider the employer’s needs. To support return-to-work efforts, your guidance about work should consider the employer’s business needs. Employers require that the patient’s abilities, restrictions, and limitations be described in concrete terms because they must decide which specific tasks are unsafe and which ones they can reasonably expect the recovering worker to perform. However, employers often fail to send information to the physician about the patient’s job tasks—such that the clinician must rely on patient self-reporting, which might be inaccurate, incomplete, or biased.15 When a patient needs protection against foreseeable harm, highlight specific activities that are currently unsafe on the recovery timeline.
Employers rely on the physician to (1) estimate what the patient can do and (2) describe work ability in clear, objective terms that both patient and employer can interpret (TABLE). For example, “no heavy lifting” might be hard for an employer to interpret; “may lift 10 pounds from the floor to the waist as many as 12 times an hour” might be applied in a more practical manner to help a patient return to work safely.31 Including specific numbers, rates, and metrics in activity restrictions can also help demonstrate improvement over the course of treatment.
Be clear and specific on work restrictions.During recovery, it is important to tell the patient which temporary work restrictions are intended to prevent further injury or recurrence (prophylactic work restrictions) and which are an estimate of what they are able to do safely at work (capacity-based restrictions). Your written work restrictions form should be kept separate from private medical information because those restrictions will be the basis of subsequent conversations between patient and employer, who should be invited to give feedback if the guidance needs revision or clarification.