Recognizing and intervening in child sex trafficking

,; ,; ,; ,; ,; ,

doi:10.12788/jfp.0144

Behavioral Health

Recognizing and intervening in child sex trafficking

J Fam Pract. 2021 January;70(1):29-34 | 10.12788/jfp.0144

PDF Download

References

1. Samko Tracey (Department of Pediatrics, LA County + University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA). Conversation with: Vidhi Doshi (Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA). July 8, 2019.

2. Institute of Medicine; National Research Council. Confronting Commercial Sexual Exploitation and Sex Trafficking of Minors in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2013.

3. Greenbaum VJ, Titchen K, Walker-Descartes I, et al. Multi-level prevention of human trafficking: the role of health care professionals. Prev Med. 2018;114:164-167.

4. Smith LA, Vardman SH, Snow MA. The national report on domestic minor sex trafficking: America’s prostituted children. 2009. Accessed January 11, 2021. http://sharedhope.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/SHI_National_Report_on_DMST_2009.pdf

5. Know the facts: commercial sexual exploitation of children. In: Connections. Summer 2011. Washington Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs. Accessed January 11, 2021. www.wcsap.org/sites/default/files/uploads/resources_publications/connections/Commercial_Sexual_Exploitation_of_Youth_2011.pdf

6. Varma S, Gillespie S, McCracken C, et al. Characteristics of child commercial sexual exploitation and sex trafficking victims presenting for medical care in the United States. Child Abuse Negl. 2015;44:98-105.

7. Walker K, California Child Welfare Council. Ending the commercial sexual exploitation of children: a call for multi-system collaboration in California. 2013. Accessed January 11, 2021. https://youthlaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Ending-CSEC-A-Call-for-Multi-System_Collaboration-in-CA.pdf

8. Landers M, McGrath K, Johnson MH, et al. Baseline characteristics of dependent youth who have been commercially sexually exploited: findings from a specialized treatment program. J Child Sex Abus. 2017;26:692-709.

9. Greenbaum VJ, Dodd M, McCracken C. A short screening tool to identify victims of child sex trafficking in the health care setting. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018;34:33-37.

10. Sy E, Quach T, Lee J, et al. Responding to commercially sexually exploited children (CSEC): a community health center‘s journey towards creating a primary care clinical CSEC screening tool in the United States. Inter J Soc Sci Stud. 2016;4:45-51.

11. Chisolm-Straker M, Sze J, Einbond J, et al. Screening for human trafficking among homeless young adults. Childr Youth Serv Rev. 2019;98:72-79.

12. Richie-Zavaleta AC, Villanueva A, Martinez-Donate A, et al. Sex trafficking victims at their junction with the healthcare setting—a mixed-methods inquiry. J Hum Traffick. 2020;6:1-29.

13. Chisolm-Straker M, Miller CL, Duke G, et al. A framework for the development of healthcare provider education programs on human trafficking part two: survivors. J Hum Traffick. 2019;5:410-424.

14. Heilemann T, Santhiveeran J. How do female adolescents cope and survive the hardships of prostitution? A content analysis of existing literature. J Ethn Cult Divers Soc Work. 2011;20:57-76.

15. Greenbaum J, Crawford-Jakubiak JE, Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect. Child sex trafficking and commercial sexual exploitation: health care needs of victims. Pediatrics. 2015;135:566-574.

16. Barnert E, Iqbal Z, Bruce J, et al. Commercial sexual exploitation and sex trafficking of children and adolescents: a narrative review. Acad Pediatr. 2017;17:825-829.

17. Dovydaitis T. Human trafficking: the role of the health care provider. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2010;55:462-467.

18. English A, Kivlahan C. Human rights and human trafficking of adolescents: legal and clinical perspectives. In: Titchen K, Miller E, Eds. Medical Perspectives on Human Trafficking in Adolescents. Springer Nature; 2020:21-41.

19. Price K, Nelson BD, Macias-Konstantopoulos WL. Understanding health care access disparities among human trafficking survivors: profiles of health care experiences, access, and engagement. J Interpers Violence. 2019; doi: 10.1177/0886260519889934.

20. Chambers R, Ravi A, Paulus S. Human trafficking: how family physicians can recognize and assist victims. Am Fam Physician. 2019;100:202-204.

Recognize clues to trafficking

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) offers a framework for trafficking prevention. Health care providers are encouraged to use the CDC Social-Ecological Model which describes targeted prevention strategies at the individual, relationship, community, and societal levels.³

Risk factors for entering trafficking. Younger age increases a child’s vulnerability to exploitation, due to a lack of maturity, limited cognitive development, and ease of deception. The mean age of trafficking survivors is 15 years.⁴History of child abuse and other traumatic experiences can lead children to run away from home. It is estimated that, once on the streets, most teens will be recruited by a trafficker within 48 hours.⁵ Poor self-esteem, depression, substance abuse, history of truancy, and early sexual maturation also increase the risk of becoming involved in trafficking (TABLE 1).^2,6-8

Clinical findings suggestive of trafficking. Many physicians grasp the critical role they play in confronting trafficking, but they lack specific training, experience, and assessment tools.³ Notably, in 1 retrospective study, 46% of victims had been seen by a provider within the previous 2 months.⁶ One of the major challenges to identifying survivors of trafficking is to recognize critical signs, of which there are many (TABLE 1^2,6-8). Often these include a history of sexual assault, multiple pregnancies, requests for contraception at an early age, or evidence of physical injury.

Screen to identify trafficking

Universal, validated screening tools to accurately identify trafficked youth is an area of growing research. Some tools have been validated, but only for specific populations such as homeless or incarcerated youth or in emergency department (ED) patients. Tools for sex trafficking identification that may be useful in primary care include the Child Sex Trafficking (CST) screen validated in ED settings (TABLE 2),⁹ the Commercial Sexual Exploitation-Identification Tool (CSE-IT) in multiple settings (TABLE 3),^10,11 and the Quick Youth Indicators for Trafficking (QYIT) in homeless youth (TABLE 4).¹¹ The QYIT is the first validated labor and sex trafficking screening tool in homeless young adults. Children who screen positive for sex trafficking should be further assessed using a comprehensive tool.

Barriers to effective recognition of trafficked individuals. Financial factors limit access to health care. Also, survivors have cited multiple barriers for health professionals that prevent identification of survivors’ trafficked status.^12,13 Once in the medical setting, disclosure is impacted by time constraints, fear of judgment by clinicians, and the risk of re-traumatization. Survivors have also cited lack of privacy, control strategies by their traffickers, lack of provider empathy, and fear of police as barriers to disclosure.¹⁴

Continue to: The medical impact of trafficking