Case Reports

28-year-old woman • weakness • anxiety • altered mental status • Dx?

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

The role of bias. From the patient’s initial visits to the ED to her hospital admission, there was a prominent affixation, known as the anchoring bias,3 by the clinicians providing her care: All were focused heavily on her psychiatric features. Conversely, the evaluation for patients with suspected psychiatric diagnoses should focus on successfully ruling out major organic etiology with a broad differential diagnosis. It is crucial for providers to take a step back and make a conscious attempt to avoid fixation on a particular diagnosis, especially when it is psychiatric in nature. This allows the provider to actively consider alternative explanations for a patient presentation and work through a more encompassing differential.

The distinguishing symptoms. There is a common association between comorbid mood disorders (eg, depression, anxiety) and epilepsy.4 Another clue is ictal anxiety or nervousness, which is commonly observed in patients with partial seizures (and occurred with our patient).

These ictal episodes can be difficult to identify within the context of an isolated psychiatric diagnosis.5 The distinction can be clarified by the presence of associated somatic symptoms, which in this case included unilateral cramping, paresthesia, and weakness. These symptoms should clue in a practitioner to the possibility of underlying neurologic pathology, which should prompt the ordering of either an EEG or, at minimum, a neurological consultation.

THE TAKEAWAY

This case report shows how anchoring bias can lead to a delay in diagnosis and treatment. Avoidance of this type of bias requires heightened cognitive awareness by medical providers. A more system-based approach is to have structured diagnostic assessments,6 such as conducting a thorough neurological exam for patients with somatic symptoms and exacerbating comorbid psychiatric conditions.

It may also help to review cases like this with colleagues from diverse disciplinary backgrounds, highlighting thought processes and sharing uncertainty.3 These processes may shed light on confounding diagnoses that might be playing a role in a patient’s presentation and ultimately aid in the decision-making process.

CORRESPONDENCE
Paimon Ameli, DO, Naval Medical Center San Diego, 34800 Bob Wilson Drive, San Diego, CA 92134; paimonm@gmail.com

Pages

Recommended Reading

Lessons for patients with MS and COVID-19
MDedge Family Medicine
Insomnia may have a role in generation of stressful life events
MDedge Family Medicine
Study validates OSA phenotypes in Latinos
MDedge Family Medicine
Vascular dementia risk particularly high in type 2 diabetes
MDedge Family Medicine
OTC ‘brain boosters’ may pose serious risks, experts say
MDedge Family Medicine
Geriatric patients: My three rules for them
MDedge Family Medicine
Nerve damage linked to prone positioning in COVID-19
MDedge Family Medicine
Music’s charms may soothe heart failure’s effects
MDedge Family Medicine
Stroke may be the first symptom of COVID-19 in younger patients
MDedge Family Medicine
COVID-19 risks are no higher in patients with multiple sclerosis
MDedge Family Medicine