PURLs

Aspirin, Yes, for at-risk elderly—but what about the healthy elderly?

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Outcomes. The outcome of CVD was a composite of fatal coronary heart disease, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), fatal or nonfatal ischemic stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure, and the outcome of major adverse cardiovascular event was a composite of fatal cardiovascular disease (excluding death from heart failure), nonfatal MI, or fatal and nonfatal ischemic stroke.

Results. No difference was seen between the aspirin and placebo groups in CVD outcomes (10.7 events per 1000 person-years vs 11.3 events per 1000 person-years, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-1.08) or major cardiovascular events (7.8 events per 1000 person-years vs 8.8 events per 1000 person-years, respectively; HR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.77-1.03). The composite and individual endpoints of fatal cardiovascular disease, heart failure hospitalizations, fatal and nonfatal MI, and ischemic stroke also did not differ significantly between the groups.

Because of this trial, the ACC and AHA have updated their guidelines on primary prevention of CVD to recommend against the routine use of aspirin in patients > 70 years of age.

The rate of major hemorrhagic events (composite of hemorrhagic stroke, intracranial bleed, or extracranial bleed), however, was higher in the aspirin vs the placebo group (8.6 events per 1000 person-years vs 6.2 events per 1000 person-years, respectively; HR = 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.6; number needed to harm = 98).

WHAT’S NEW

Finding of more harm than good leads to change in ACC/AHA guidelines

Although the most recent USPSTF guidelines state the evidence is insufficient to assess the risks and benefits of aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in this age group, this trial reveals there is a greater risk of hemorrhagic events than there is prevention of cardiovascular outcomes with aspirin use in healthy elderly patients > 70 years of age.6 Because of this trial, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) have updated their guidelines on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease to recommend that aspirin not be used routinely in patients > 70 years of age.7

CAVEATS

Potential benefit to people at higher risk?

The rate of cardiovascular disease was lower than expected in this overall healthy population, so it is not known if cardiovascular benefits may outweigh the risk of bleeding in a higher-risk population. The trial also didn’t address the potential harms of deprescribing aspirin. Additionally, although aspirin may not be protective for cardiovascular events and may lead to more bleeding, there may be other benefits to aspirin in this patient population that were not addressed by this study.

Continue to: CHALLENGES TO IMPLEMENTATION

Copyright © 2020. The Family Physicians Inquiries Network. All rights reserved.

Online-Only Materials

AttachmentSize
PDF icon jfp06904e16_methodology.pdf205.78 KB

Recommended Reading

COVID-19 shifts telehealth to the center of cardiology
MDedge Family Medicine
Wuhan data link COVID-19 with myocardial damage
MDedge Family Medicine
The power and promise of person-generated health data (Part II)
MDedge Family Medicine
Primordial cardiovascular prevention draws closer
MDedge Family Medicine
Renal denervation shown safe and effective in pivotal trial
MDedge Family Medicine
Dapagliflozin trial in CKD halted because of high efficacy
MDedge Family Medicine
Alirocumab effective in homozygous FH
MDedge Family Medicine
New lipid-lowering drug class slashes LDL in HoFH patients
MDedge Family Medicine
New guidance on management of acute CVD during COVID-19
MDedge Family Medicine
Enhanced team-based CVD care found to benefit diabetes patients
MDedge Family Medicine