Conference Coverage

Patient adjustments needed for closed-loop insulin delivery


 

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM PAS 2018


Device readiness is another area researchers have studied in the run-up to closed-loop systems. “The idea that everybody’s going to be ready to start in the same way, I think, is going to set us up for some failures,” he noted, adding that, in general, parents are much more enthusiastic about this than pediatric patients.

“Individuals who had been using diabetes devices – and some had already been in closed-loop studies – They had more realistic expectations of what these systems are going to be, because they knew that it wasn’t going to be a complete fix. Whereas others with more limited experience with component devices and these systems had much higher expectations and reported a fair amount of dissatisfaction at the end of the study because it didn’t do everything that they wanted it to do.”

Waves of uptake

“Ultimately, a closed-loop system is going to be judged by whether it can increase time on target and reduce cognitive burden,” said Dr. Hood. He finished his talk with some projections about the future of closed-loop systems. “I think we’re going to probably to have different waves, or types, of closed-loop users.”

The first wave will be the group that’s already “sold” on the idea, which might encompass about 15% of patients. The second wave, which might represent about 30% of the relevant patient population, will be those who are sold on the idea and will likely use it but will have high expectations of the system’s ease of use and effectiveness and thus are highly likely to discontinue its use if those expectations are not met.


“The third wave will be those who might use a closed-loop system but might be unaware of them currently and will need a fair amount of education.” And, finally, the fourth group are unlikely to ever use closed-loop insulin delivery. “They are a group that feels burned by previous generations of systems, and I think that they may not perceive benefit,” Dr. Hood suggested.

“But all of this is to say that I do think that a tailored experience, and one that is focused on different profiles, can optimize both the uptake and the use of these systems.”

Dr. Hood reported receiving grant/research support from Dexcom and being a consultant for Lilly Innovation Center, J&J Diabetes Institute, and Bigfoot Biomedical.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Trends in teen consumption of sports drinks are up and down
MDedge Family Medicine
Hematocrit improvement with SGLT2 inhibitor: Not just a diuretic effect?
MDedge Family Medicine
VIDEO: Diabetes patients achieve lipid goals on alirocumab
MDedge Family Medicine
VIDEO: Move beyond BMI to see obesity as a disease
MDedge Family Medicine
VIDEO: Canagliflozin’s HbA1c effect muted over time by placebo group effects
MDedge Family Medicine
Canagliflozin linked to lower HbA1c levels in younger patients
MDedge Family Medicine
CANVAS: Canagliflozin improved renal outcomes in diabetes
MDedge Family Medicine
SUSTAIN-7: GLP-1 receptor agonists effective in elderly
MDedge Family Medicine
GDM, subsequent diabetes predictive of later renal damage
MDedge Family Medicine
Oral diabetes drugs linked to lower levels of bone formation marker
MDedge Family Medicine