Law & Medicine

Shinal v. Toms: It’s Now Harder to Get Informed Consent


 

Dr. Tan is emeritus professor of medicine and former adjunct professor of law at the University of Hawaii, Honolulu. This article is meant to be educational and does not constitute medical, ethical, or legal advice. For additional information, readers may contact the author at siang@hawaii.edu.

References

1. Shinal v. Toms, J-106-2016, Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Decided: June 20, 2017.

2. Valles v. Albert Einstein Medical Center, 805 A.2d (PA, 2002).

3. Informed-consent ruling may have “far-reaching, negative impact.” AMA Wire, Aug 8, 2017.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Young adults lead the ranks of recently insured
MDedge Family Medicine
Medicare fee schedule: Proposed pay bump falls short of promise
MDedge Family Medicine
Midyear formulary changes wreak havoc on diabetes care
MDedge Family Medicine
In California, medical vaccine exemptions tripled after personal belief exemption ban
MDedge Family Medicine
Q&A: CDC director Brenda Fitzgerald stresses ‘science and service’
MDedge Family Medicine
Postpartum depression screening in well-child care appears promising
MDedge Family Medicine
Trump administration ends DACA program, stranding medical students
MDedge Family Medicine
Hurricane Harvey tests Houston physicians’ mettle
MDedge Family Medicine
Sen. Alexander seeks quick, passable steps to stabilize individual markets
MDedge Family Medicine
Florida health officials prepare for Hurricane Irma
MDedge Family Medicine