Rectum
The rectum has tolerance to XRT similar to the colon,38 but because of its anatomical location, rectal radiation injury is more common, and is typically seen after XRT for prostate, bladder, cervical, or uterine cancer. Acute rectal radiation injury is seen in 50% to 78% of patients,36 and symptoms are similar to that of injury to the sigmoid (eg, tenesmus, loose evacuations, hematochezia), all of which are consequences of direct radiation injury to the mucosa.
Chronic rectal radiation injury may present in a variety of ways. Tenesmus and incontinence are seen in 8% to 20% of patients, frequent defecation in 50%, urgency in 47%, and rectal cancer in up to 2% to 3% after 10 years.36,37 Other complications include anorectal strictures, fissures, fistulae, and bleeding from rectal telangiectasias. While anoscopy can diagnose many of these, flexible sigmoidoscopy is needed to examine more proximal rectal sites as well as for treatment. Treatment of these chronic complications of XRT is analogous to those of the colon7 with the following exceptions:
- Anorectal strictures. In contrast to sigmoid strictures, these are generally more amenable to dilatation. If symptoms recur frequently, patients may be instructed on self-dilatations at home.
- Bleeding from rectal telangiectasias. In the rare cases where endoscopic APC is not feasible or successful, an alternative treatment would be radiofrequency ablation or the application of 2% to 10% formalin intra-rectally. This is reported to have up to a 93% success rate;37 however, because formalin can also cause rectal pain, spasm, ulcerations, or stenosis, it is not a first-line therapy.
- Tenesmus, urgency, and incontinence. These represent a therapeutic challenge, often with no satisfactory outcomes. An array of empiric treatments may be used for symptomatic relief, including but not limited to, a trial of loperamide or fiber supplementation, which may be helpful for frequent evacuation.
- Fistulous tracts associated with rectal radiation. Endoscopic clip closure of XRT-related and other fistulous tracts is an option. This has been attempted via a variety of techniques, but results depend on the size and location of the fistulous tract, as well as other characteristics of the fistula and its surrounding tissue.7,38,39 Use of mesenchymal stem cells has also been described for rectal and other fistulae,40 but its indications have yet to be elucidated, and current use is mostly experimental.
CASE The patient’s recent-onset symptoms and clinical history were most suggestive of radiation proctopathy; a shared decision was made to pursue endoscopic evaluation with possible therapeutic intervention.
Given that data were not available about the quality of the colon preparation during the exam 7 years earlier, and to rule out a more proximal colonic lesion, the patient was scheduled for colonoscopy. This revealed numerous telangiectasias and moderate friability involving the distal third of the rectum, consistent with radiation proctopathy. The telangiectasias were treated with APC. Follow-up flexible sigmoidoscopy 2 months later showed a few remaining scattered telangiectasias, which were also treated with APC.
The patient has been clinically well, without evidence of bleeding for 6 months and with resolution of anemia.
CORRESPONDENCE
James H. Tabibian, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, 14445 Olive View Dr., 2B-182, Sylmar, CA 91342; JTabibian@dhs.lacounty.gov.