Commentary

What difference would an empagliflozin CVD indication make?


 

References

“An FDA-approved indication for reduction in cardiovascular death would be influential with physicians and patients,” predicted Dr. Fonarow.

A FDA imprimatur on the cardiovascular mortality benefit would help buttress belief in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME result and might help drive better reimbursement coverage. A thumbs down will likely dampen enthusiasm in and practicality of the treatment until additional, corroborative data appear.

mzoler@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

Pages

Recommended Reading

Endometriosis linked to higher CHD risk
MDedge Endocrinology
Statins inversely linked to colorectal cancer in patients with IBD
MDedge Endocrinology
Only ‘early’ estradiol limits atherosclerosis progression
MDedge Endocrinology
VIDEO: New ACC consensus guidance addresses nonstatin therapies
MDedge Endocrinology
VIDEO: HOPE-3 bolsters primary prevention in intermediate-risk patients
MDedge Endocrinology
Ticagrelor cuts post-MI events in diabetes patients
MDedge Endocrinology
Earlier bariatric surgery may improve cardiovascular outcomes
MDedge Endocrinology
STAMPEDE: Metabolic surgery bests medical therapy long term
MDedge Endocrinology
Menopause and cardiovascular risk examined in type 1 diabetes
MDedge Endocrinology
FDA panel narrowly endorses empagliflozin’s cardiovascular mortality benefit
MDedge Endocrinology

Related Articles