Conference Coverage

Is there a need for tPA before thrombectomy in patients with stroke?


 

FROM ISC 2021

Individualized approach probable

Dr. Majoie suggested that different patients may be suitable for the different approaches.

“I think we are heading for individualized treatment. If we have a young patient and the angiography suite is ready, we could probably skip tPA, but it would be for the neurologist/neuroradiologist to make individualized decisions on this,” he said. “We need to look at subgroups for more information.”

Another large trial that investigated this issue, SWIFT-DIRECT, is expected to be presented later this year. An Australian trial, DIRECT-SAFE, is ongoing and is at an early stage of recruitment.

Dr. Roos said that the data from all the trials will be combined for a more comprehensive analysis of the benefits and risks of the two approaches in various subgroups.

Commenting on the study was cochair of the ISC session at which it was presented, Tudor Jovin, MD, chair of neurology at Cooper University Hospital, Cherry Hill, N.J.

“Putting these results together with the previous Asian studies, I think we can say that direct thrombectomy without tPA is clearly not superior to the combined approach of tPA plus thrombectomy,” he said.

Dr. Jovin explained that, in theory, direct thrombectomy could be faster than the combined approach and that the risk for symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage could be lower. But neither of these two possible benefits were seen in this study.

He agreed with Dr. Roos that MR CLEAN NO IV could have failed to show noninferiority of the direct strategy because the sample was not large enough.

“The results of the two approaches are very similar in this study and in the Asian studies, so it doesn’t appear that tPA adds very much, and it is associated with a significant increase in costs,” he said.

“The answer will probably be that there is not a ‘one-size-fits-all’ strategy, and we may end up using different approaches for different patient groups,” Dr. Jovin added. “Information on this will come from subgroups analyses from these trials.”

MR CLEAN NO-IV trial was part of the CONTRAST consortium, which is supported by the Netherlands Cardiovascular Research Initiative (an initiative of the Dutch Heart Foundation), the Brain Foundation Netherlands, Medtronic, Health-Holland, and Top Sector Life Sciences. The study received additional unrestricted funding from Stryker European Operations. Dr. Roos and Dr. Majoie are shareholders of Nico Lab.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Blood pressure treatment reduces bleeding in ICH
MDedge Emergency Medicine
COVID-19 and risk of clotting: ‘Be proactive about prevention’
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Urgent recall for Penumbra JET 7 Xtra Flex reperfusion catheters
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Left atrial appendage occlusion, DOAC comparable for AFib
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Coffee lowers heart failure risk in unique study
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Missed visits during pandemic cause ‘detrimental ripple effects’
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Direct transfer to angiography improves outcome in large-vessel stroke
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Meta-analysis supports late thrombectomy in selected stroke patients
MDedge Emergency Medicine
AstraZeneca COVID vaccine: Clotting disorder mechanism revealed?
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Six pregnancy complications flag later heart disease risk
MDedge Emergency Medicine