Original Research

Calcipotriene 0.005%–Betamethasone Dipropionate 0.064% Ointment Versus Topical Suspension in the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis: A Randomized Pilot Study of Patient Preference

Laura F. Sandoval, DO; Karen E. Huang, MS; Jessica Harrison, BS; Adele Clark, PA-C; Steven R. Feldman, MD, PhD

From the Center for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Dr. Feldman also is from the Departments of Pathology and Public Health Sciences.

This study was funded by a grant from LEO Pharma. The Wake Forest School of Medicine Center for Dermatology Research is supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Galderma Laboratories, LP. Dr. Sandoval, Ms. Huang, Ms. Harrison, and Ms. Clark report no conflict of interest. Dr. Feldman is a consultant and speaker for and has received research grants from Galderma Laboratories, LP, and LEO Pharma.

Correspondence: Laura F. Sandoval, DO, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1071 (lsandovaldo@gmail.com).


 

References

The mean (SD) total preference score for the calcipotriene 0.005%–betamethasone dipropionate 0.064% ointment formulation was 73.5 (19.4) and 80 (20.2) for the topical suspension formulation. The difference between means was -6.5 (95% confidence interval, -19.7-6.8; P=.32 after adjusting for possible carryover and period effects). Participants used a mean (SD) of 11 (11.4) g of product per study arm for the ointment formulation and 8.8 (6.6) g for the topical suspension formulation. There was no correlation between the amount of product used and preference for product (Spearman r=-0.01; P=.94). No statistically significant difference in product preference among men versus women was noted when considering total preference score or median scores of individual survey questions. Median overall appeal rating for the ointment formulation was 5 (slightly appealing) versus 6 (moderately appealing) for the topical suspension formulation, approaching statistical significance with P=.06 (Table 2). No significant carryover effects from one product to the other were noted (P=.64). The mean (SD) total preference scores were 81.1 (18.4) and 77.6 (21.2) in participants who used the topical suspension first followed by the ointment. In participants who used the ointment first followed by the topical suspension, the mean (SD) total preference scores were 69.4 (17.6) and 78.9 (22.8). Self-reported treatment adherence according to the participant’s daily medication diary was 100%.

Adverse effects during the study included 1 report of neck and back muscle pain and 1 report of sinusitis; neither was considered to be related to the study drugs.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Psoriasis is independently associated with advanced liver fibrosis
Psoriasis Collection
TNF-alpha blockers effective in sustaining reduced PsA activity
Psoriasis Collection
Few psoriatic arthritis patients achieve minimal disease activity on methotrexate
Psoriasis Collection
Secukinumab tames psoriatic arthritis in FUTURE 2 trial
Psoriasis Collection
Dermatologists counsel psoriasis patients on obesity, less on alcohol and tobacco
Psoriasis Collection
Oral tofacitinib scores against psoriasis in phase III trial
Psoriasis Collection
Most Common Dermatologic Conditions Encountered by Dermatologists and Nondermatologists
Psoriasis Collection
MACE Update
Psoriasis Collection
Consider phototherapy for certain psoriasis patients
Psoriasis Collection
Ixekizumab linked to decrease in psoriasis-related sexual difficulties
Psoriasis Collection

Related Articles