Original Research

Medicare Part D Prescription Claims for Brodalumab: Analysis of Annual Trends for 2017-2019

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Overall, most experts agree that there is no increase in the risk for suicide associated with brodalumab compared to the general population. A 2-year pharmacovigilance report on brodalumab supports the safety of this drug.5 All participants who completed suicide during the clinical trials harbored an underlying psychiatric disorder or stressor(s).6

Although causation between brodalumab and SIB has not been demonstrated, it remains imperative that prescribers diligently assess patients’ risk of SIB and subsequently their access to appropriate psychiatric services as a precaution, if necessary. This is particularly important for private practice prescribers, who constitute the majority of Medicare D brodalumab claims, because they must ensure collaboration with a multidisciplinary team involving mental health providers. Lastly, considering that the highest number of brodalumab Medicare D claims were in western and southern states, it is critical to note that those 2 regions also harbor comparatively fewer mental health facilities that accept Medicare than other regions of the country.7 Prescribers in western and southern states must be mindful of mental health coverage limitations when treating psoriasis patients with brodalumab.

The increase in the number of claims, beneficiaries, and prescribers of brodalumab during its first 3 years of availability might be attributed to its efficacy and safety. On the other hand, the boxed warning and REMS associated with brodalumab might have led to underutilization of this drug compared to other IL-17 inhibitors.

Our analysis is limited by its representative restriction to Medicare patients. There also are limited data on brodalumab given its novelty. Individual attributes of prescribers with fewer than 11 annual claims for brodalumab could not be obtained because of dataset regulations; however, aggregated utilization statistics provide an indication of brodalumab prescribing patterns among all providers. Furthermore, during this analysis, data on the Medicare D database were limited to 2013 through 2020. Studies are needed to determine prescribing patterns of brodalumab since this study period.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Surgical Deroofing for Hidradenitis Suppurativa
MDedge Dermatology
FDA approves oral TYK2 inhibitor deucravacitinib for treating psoriasis
MDedge Dermatology
Optimizing Narrowband UVB Phototherapy: Is It More Challenging for Your Older Patients?
MDedge Dermatology
Sustained response at 2 years reported for newly approved oral psoriasis agent
MDedge Dermatology
Artemisia capillaris extract
MDedge Dermatology
Brodalumab suicide risk similar to other biologics, postmarket study finds
MDedge Dermatology
Open Clinical Trials for Psoriasis
MDedge Dermatology
Apremilast alleviates severe psoriasis in some children, data show
MDedge Dermatology
Psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis insurance coverage remains restrictive
MDedge Dermatology
Apremilast may have some cardiometabolic benefits in patients with psoriasis
MDedge Dermatology