Commentary

Reporting Biopsy Margin Status for Cutaneous Basal Cell Carcinoma: To Do or Not to Do

Author and Disclosure Information

 

Authors’ Response

We appreciate the thorough and thoughtful comments in the Letter to the Editor. We agree with the author’s assertion that negative margins on skin specimens does not equate to “completely excised” and that the intent of the clinician is not always clear, even when the pathologist has ready access to the clinician’s notes, as was the case for the majority of specimens included in our study.

There is already variability in how pathologists report margins, including the specific verbiage used, at least for melanocytic lesions.1 The choice of whether or not to report margins and the meaning of those margins is complex due to the uncertainty inherent in margin assessment. Quantifying this uncertainty was the main reason for our study. Ultimately, the pathologist’s decision on whether and how to report margins should be focused on improving patient outcomes. There are benefits and drawbacks to all approaches, and our goal is to provide more information for clinicians and pathologists so that they may better care for their patients. Understanding the limitations of margins on submitted skin specimens—whether margins are reported or not—can only serve to guide improve clinical decision-making.

We also agree that the breadth of specialties of submitting clinicians make reporting of margins difficult, and there is likely similar breadth in their understanding of the nuances of margin assessment and reports. The solution to this problem is adequate education regarding the limitations of a pathology report, and specifically what is meant when margins are (or are not) reported on skin specimens. How to best educate the myriad clinicians who submit biopsies is, of course, the ultimate challenge.

We hope that our study adds information to this ongoing debate regarding margin status reporting, and we appreciate the discussion points raised by the author.

Eric Hossler, MD; Mary Brady, MD

From the Department of Dermatology, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Reference

  1. Sellheyer K, Bergfeld WF, Stewart E, et al. Evaluation of surgical margins in melanocytic lesions: a survey among 152 dermatopathologists.J Cutan Pathol. 2005;32:293-299.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Telemedicine is popular among Mohs surgeons – for now
MDedge Dermatology
Combined imaging methods found to enhance detection of squamous cell carcinoma
MDedge Dermatology
Exuberant Lymphomatoid Papulosis of the Head and Upper Trunk
MDedge Dermatology
Survey: Many Mohs surgeons are struggling on the job
MDedge Dermatology
Benzene found in some sunscreen products, online pharmacy says
MDedge Dermatology
Mohs surgery favorable as monotherapy for early Merkel cell carcinomas
MDedge Dermatology
The Power of a Multidisciplinary Tumor Board: Managing Unresectable and/or High-Risk Skin Cancers
MDedge Dermatology
Reexamining the Role of Diet in Dermatology
MDedge Dermatology
Benzene was found in some sunscreens. Now what?
MDedge Dermatology
Trial yields evidence that laser resurfacing may prevent NMSC in aged skin
MDedge Dermatology