Law & Medicine

Shinal v. Toms: It’s Now Harder to Get Informed Consent


 

Dr. Tan is emeritus professor of medicine and former adjunct professor of law at the University of Hawaii, Honolulu. This article is meant to be educational and does not constitute medical, ethical, or legal advice. For additional information, readers may contact the author at siang@hawaii.edu.

References

1. Shinal v. Toms, J-106-2016, Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Decided: June 20, 2017.

2. Valles v. Albert Einstein Medical Center, 805 A.2d (PA, 2002).

3. Informed-consent ruling may have “far-reaching, negative impact.” AMA Wire, Aug 8, 2017.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Five outside-the-box ideas for fixing the individual insurance market
MDedge Dermatology
Young adults lead the ranks of recently insured
MDedge Dermatology
Medicare fee schedule: Proposed pay bump falls short of promise
MDedge Dermatology
Clinical Pearl: Mastering the Flexible Scalpel Blade With the Banana Practice Model
MDedge Dermatology
Acronymic Despair: MACRA, MIPS, and Me
MDedge Dermatology
Noxious Nocebos in Dermatology
MDedge Dermatology
Trump administration ends DACA program, stranding medical students
MDedge Dermatology
Hurricane Harvey tests Houston physicians’ mettle
MDedge Dermatology
Sen. Alexander seeks quick, passable steps to stabilize individual markets
MDedge Dermatology
Florida health officials prepare for Hurricane Irma
MDedge Dermatology