From the Journals

AGA guideline defines role of biomarkers in ulcerative colitis


 

FROM GASTROENTEROLOGY

Recommendations for patients with symptomatically active disease

The recommendations for patients with symptomatically active UC follow a similar pathway. The guideline advises an evaluation strategy combining symptoms and biomarkers instead of symptoms alone.

For example, patients with moderate to severe symptoms suggestive of flare and elevated biomarkers are candidates for treatment adjustment without endoscopy.

Still, patient preferences should be considered, Dr. Singh and colleagues noted.

“Patients who place greater value in confirming inflammation, particularly when making significant treatment decisions (such as starting or switching immunosuppressive therapies), and lesser value on the inconvenience of endoscopy, may choose to pursue endoscopic evaluation before treatment adjustment,” they wrote.

For patients with mild symptoms, endoscopy is generally recommended, according to the guideline, unless the patient recently had moderate to severe symptoms and has improved after treatment adjustment; in that case, biomarkers can be used to fine-tune therapy without the need for endoscopy.

Again, providers should engage in shared-decision making, the guideline advises. Patients with mild symptoms but no biomarker results may reasonably elect to undergo endoscopy prior to testing biomarkers, while patients with mild symptoms and normal biomarkers may reasonably elect to retest biomarkers in 3-6 months.

Data remain insufficient to recommend biomarkers over endoscopy

Dr. Singh and colleagues concluded the guideline by highlighting an insufficient level of direct evidence necessary to recommend a biomarker-based treat-to-target strategy over endoscopy-based monitoring strategy, despite indirect evidence suggesting this may be the case.

“[T]here have not been any studies comparing a biomarker-based strategy with an endoscopy-based strategy for assessment and monitoring of endoscopic remission,” they wrote. “This was identified as a knowledge gap by the panel.”

The authors disclosed relationships with Pfizer, AbbVie, Lilly, and others. Dr. Axelrad disclosed relationships with Janssen, AbbVie, Pfizer, and others.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Food additives may exacerbate IBD
Clinician Reviews
Can a nationwide liver paired donation program work?
Clinician Reviews
Herbal combination tames active UC in small study
Clinician Reviews
Large cohort study finds isotretinoin not associated with IBD
Clinician Reviews
Vibrating pill can help treat constipation
Clinician Reviews
UnitedHealthcare tried to deny coverage to a chronically ill patient. He fought back, exposing the insurer’s inner workings.
Clinician Reviews
Exercise training reduces liver fat in patients with NAFLD, even without weight loss
Clinician Reviews
The 5-year survival rate for pancreatic cancer is increasing
Clinician Reviews
Gastroparesis referrals often based on misdiagnosis
Clinician Reviews
Screen high-risk individuals for NAFLD, urges guidance
Clinician Reviews