From the Journals

Outcomes have improved for PAH in connective tissue disease


 

FROM ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY

‘Still have to be aggressive at identifying the high-risk patients’

Commenting on the findings, Virginia Steen, MD, of the division of rheumatology at Georgetown University, Washington, said clinicians were finally seeing some significant changes over time in scleroderma-associated PAH.

Dr. Virginia Steen of Georgetown University, Washington

Dr. Virginia Steen

“Although some of it may be just early diagnosis, I think that the combination of early diagnosis and more aggressive treatment with combination medication is definitely making a difference,” Dr. Steen said in an interview. “The bottom line is that we as rheumatologists still have to be aggressive at identifying the high-risk patients, making an early diagnosis, and working with our pulmonary hypertension colleagues and aggressively treating these patients so we can make a long-term difference.”

The authors of an accompanying editorial said the meta-analysis’ findings showed the positive impact of early combination therapy and early diagnosis through proactive screening.

“It is notable because the present analysis again confirms that outcomes are worse in CTD-PAH than in idiopathic or familial forms of PAH, the impact of treatments should no longer be regarded as insignificant,” the editorial’s authors wrote. “This is a practice changing observation, especially now that many of the drugs are available in generic formulations and so the cost of modern PAH treatment has fallen at the same time as its true value is convincingly demonstrated.”

They also argued there was strong evidence for the value of combination therapies, both for PAH-targeted drugs used in combination and concurrent use of immunosuppression and drugs specifically for PAH in some patients with CTD-PAH.

However, they pointed out that not all treatments for idiopathic PAH were suitable for patients with CTDs, highlighting the example of anticoagulation that can improve survival in the first but worsen it in the second.

The study was funded by Actelion. Six authors declared funding and grants from the pharmaceutical sector, including the study sponsor, and three authors were employees of Actelion.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Age leads COVID-19 hospitalization risk factors in RMDs
Clinician Reviews
EULAR’s COVID-19 recommendations offer no surprises
Clinician Reviews
In scleroderma, GERD questionnaires are essential tools
Clinician Reviews
ACIP approves flu vaccine recommendations for 2020-2021
Clinician Reviews
Role of aspirin explored in primary prevention of CVD in systemic rheumatic diseases
Clinician Reviews
COVID-19–related HCQ shortages affected rheumatology patients worldwide
Clinician Reviews
COVID-19 risks in rheumatic disease remain unclear
Clinician Reviews
Chronic inflammatory diseases vary widely in CHD risk 
Clinician Reviews
Treprostinil offers some benefits for patients with ILD-associated pulmonary hypertension
Clinician Reviews
Checkpoint inhibitors’ ‘big picture’ safety shown with preexisting autoimmune diseases
Clinician Reviews