Conference Coverage

Short DAPT course beneficial after PCI in ‘bi-risk’ patients


 

FROM TCT 2021

No difference in NACE components

In fact, when the components of NACE were evaluated individually in the subgroup of patients with prior MI, both stroke (HR, 0.47; P = .16) and all-cause death (HR, 0.78; P = .28), although not significant, numerically favored abbreviated DAPT.

There was no difference between abbreviated and standard DAPT for risk of MI at 1 year (HR, 1.03; P = .92).

As in the overall MASTER DAPT results, bleeding risk (BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding) was significantly reduced in the substudy among those with a recent prior MI (P = .013) or those with no MI in the prior 12 months (P = .01).

In MASTER DAPT, which was an open-label study that randomized participants in 30 countries, all patients received one type of drug-eluting stent. While Dr. Smits conceded that it is not clear whether the conclusions about abbreviated DAPT can be extrapolated to other stents, he noted that recent long-term outcomes for modern drug-eluting coronary stents have been similar, suggesting these results might be more broadly applicable.

According to Dr. Smit, the consistency of this subgroup analysis with the previously published MASTER DAPT study is mutually reinforcing for a role of abbreviated DAPT in patients at high bleeding risk. Other experts agreed.

“One of the concerns that people have had is exactly what has been addressed here in this subgroup analysis. These are the patients that are not only bleeding-risk high but ischemic-risk high. The question was whether the benefit of reducing bleeding risk is offset by increasing stent thrombosis or other ischemic event outcomes, and the answer from the analysis is really clearly no,” said Philippe Gabriel Steg, MD, chief, department of cardiology, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, at the meeting, sponsored by the Cardiovascular Research Foundation.

Dr. Smits reports financial relationships with Abiomed, Abbott Vascular, Daiichi-Sankyo, Microport, Opsense, and Terumo Medical. Dr. Steg reports financial relationships with Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Idorsia, Merck, Novartis, Regeneron, and Sanofi-Aventis.

Pages

Recommended Reading

FDA investigating potential sex differences in LAAO adverse outcomes
MDedge Cardiology
Pacemakers after TAVR: No long-term survival differences
MDedge Cardiology
AHA: Quality of STEMI care has stalled, needs improvement
MDedge Cardiology
Real-world data favor invasive strategy for NSTEMI with CKD
MDedge Cardiology
FDA class I recall of CardioSave hybrid/rescue IABPs
MDedge Cardiology
Renal denervation remains only promising, per latest meta-analysis
MDedge Cardiology
SUGAR trial finds superior stent for those with diabetes and CAD
MDedge Cardiology
FFR-guided PCI falls short vs. surgery in multivessel disease: FAME 3
MDedge Cardiology
How applicable is ISCHEMIA trial to U.S. clinical practice?
MDedge Cardiology
FAVOR III China: QFR-guided PCI shows advantage over angiography
MDedge Cardiology