Conference Coverage

TCT: Ranolazine fails to block angina after incomplete revascularization

View on the News

Incomplete revascularization poses unmet need

The adjunctive treatment of patients who undergo incomplete revascularization is a real unmet need. The results from the RIVER-PCI trial showed that about 27% of patients who undergo an incomplete revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention have a major ischemia-driven event within the next 2 years. In RIVER-PCI, we were unable to prevent these events by giving patients the anti-ischemia drug ranolazine.

In the study, the rates of new MIs and cardiovascular mortality were relatively low. It was recurrent ischemic events that drove the outcome we saw. If nothing else, this study has opened a new avenue for research into this high-risk group of patients.

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News

Dr. Gregg W. Stone

As interventional cardiologists, we don’t usually think about the coronary disease that we leave behind following a revascularization procedure. Patients who undergo incomplete revascularization may avoid having an excess of future MIs or death, but they still experience a lot of angina, which leads to rehospitalizations and new procedures. I think we could improve the quality of life for our patients if we can come up with new ways to improve revascularization procedures and better approaches to preventing ischemia and angina following these procedures.

Dr. Gregg W. Stone was chairman of the RIVER-PCI trial and is professor and director of cardiovascular research and education at the Center for Interventional Vascular Therapy at Columbia University in New York. He has been a consultant to nine companies but has no relationship with Gilead Sciences and the Menarini Group, the two companies that sponsored the trial and that market ranolazine. He made these comments during the session that discussed the RIVER-PCI results.


 

AT TCT 2015

References

“We had a very strict definition of these events, and every episode was reviewed by an independent committee that judged whether or not to include the event. Every patient with an ischemia-driven event had to show characteristic symptoms and objective evidence of ischemia such as an ECG change or elevated enzymes. We tried to approach judging patient symptoms as scientifically as possible,” he said.

mzoler@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

Pages

Recommended Reading

Remote ischemic preconditioning does no good
MDedge Cardiology
Reattaching intercostals fails to squelch spinal cord ischemia in TAAA repairs
MDedge Cardiology
FDA approves first bioabsorbable-polymer stent
MDedge Cardiology
Endovascular treatment of acute IVC thrombosis found effective
MDedge Cardiology
TCT: Absorbable metal scaffold performs well in BIOSOLVE II
MDedge Cardiology
ESC: What’s the hottest recent advance in cardiology? And the winner is …
MDedge Cardiology
TCT: Absorb BVS meets pivotal U.S. noninferiority goal
MDedge Cardiology
TCT: Radial PCI access as effective as femoral at 1 year
MDedge Cardiology
TCT: Routine thrombectomy with PCI raises stroke risk 66% in STEMI patients
MDedge Cardiology
TCT: FFR-CT improved costs, quality of life in PLATFORM trial
MDedge Cardiology